Cancel
Save avatar

Change avatar costs 20 points

Cookie Muncher
1500 points
2202 Comment(s)
694 Upvote(s)
Cookie Muncher Jesse-D - 1726979142
they definitely said take it like everyone else is an npc. They weren't definitive. They also said we only like to watch 1 at a time, not that there is 1 per world. They also explained if they explain too much they'll receive punishment
0
0
Cookie Muncher Anubis - 1726978475
they definitely said WE like to only watch one person at a time. There could be others with different streamers... It could be a support character too
1
0
this MF is prolly closer to chucky
0
0
easy. He saw the "stream comments" the found the supply crate. Got to his parents house, and it clicked he was in a game as his parents wouldnt act like that
0
0
Cookie Muncher - 1726974880
Lemme mansplain the zombie game about the importance of stealth then proceed to scream at the top of my lungs when I actually see one
1
0
Cookie Muncher Lucky13 - 1726911962
on the condition that he lets them go yeah... Probably
0
0
humans metamorphize in disasters as seen by purple hair team member when she caught her sister killing
1
0
This is why i said a lot of people know OF what happened, but not the actual logistics. Sure there is documentation of everything down to the size of lice in mm. But not everything was done by him. He's panted 9th gate hell when he probably belongs in the 4th maybe 5th lol
1
0
this is more about covering their ass.
If they escaped it was the wardens fault.
If they died early, it was the wardens fault.
5 world disasters sitting in the facility, and not one superhuman at their level. Suppress what
0
0
of this I will not try to argue, but the point was evil, where you draw the line of something being evil, knowledge of your action being evil, and who is worse. Inciting people you could call morally wrong, but in the end, it wasn't you doing it. So does that really make you 9th gate hell or just 3rd gate. This was the main point. I wasn't trying to acquit, just rightfully convict ;). But there is a difference between someone who commits genocide and just a couple murders while not understanding what evil is on both accounts. This is like the wars going on in gaza. Should anyone intervene? It's a holy war, not a war for power. They didn't have terrorist connections UNTIL foreign forces butted in. Jewish religion had one of the most barbaric crusades. They are by no means as clean as they make themselves out to be. Niether are catholics or muslims. This is the biggest problem with religious wars, since every religion has had at least 1 war in which they spear headed, it makes it hard to determine who is in the right.

Anyways, this is why I try to avoid the whole religion aspect but it was definitely there
1
0
Death sentence doesnt just mean execution. It could mean life in prison without the chance of release
0
0
honestly don't care if he wins loses or ties... I just want progress lol
0
0
I mean he knew of it obviously as the reason they were attacked are listed in the declaration of war. But if you think about how many reports he signed: Economy, military support, any expendature on a national level, major decisions, do you think he read them all or listened to the gist of documentation. Even in the white house the cabinet members give multiple solutions and only highlight the actions unless asked to explain in further detail. This ensures fastest responses with documentation of orders given. There is a lot that needs to be factored in to a decision and 2cents to get rid of a person is cheaper than keeping them, disease eventually multiplies so burning bodies becomes necessary at which time is more cost effective to not waste the 2 cents per person. Then we can move on to Himmler saying that he can make use of the prisoners just sign this document. Not every paper signed by a king is thoroughly read
Edit: He also knew beforehand but more than likely not the level of twisted
1
0
meant killing,
But in regards to Hitler there are some history points they don't teach in school. Like schizophrenia, the scope of a leaders involvement down to the ground level. A good example would be "we have prisoners who are spreading diseases, what should we do?" So the leader says "deal with them in the most effective way" without intending it to be, this is an execution order. It cost too much money to feed, nurse the sick, and look after prisoners.
Everyone blames Hitler for all the things the Nazis did but anyone who has played telephone knows orders change from the 3rd person. It's not like he oversaw the Jews. He made a few decisions and the government under him followed through. Hitler was way too focused on expanding his influence to deal with minorities. Anyone who tells you otherwise is an idiot who can only listen to the lies of the victors being crammed down their throat instead of thinking objectively. It takes a handful of generals to oversee areas in Iraq. How much attention does it take to steadily expand 20x the size of your country?
The moral of why they paint him so bad is that he is the perfect example of absolute authority corrupts absolutely. But his biggest atrocity is expanding his country. Which president (anywhere anytime) hasn't had people kill each other over territory? There is so much that goes into leading a country at war that it'd blow your mind but you can just listen and believe a story COMPLETELY at face value. FYI look up Himmler. He was the person in charge of the SS, intern camps, experimentation, catching jews, ect. People forget about this sadist. By the way, Himmler on the other hand was a machiavellian. The ends justify the means. He fits evil and knows. There is so much more evidence that Hitler isn't as bad as his cohorts and made out to be, but it's literally to big of a discussion.

I am by no means denying the slave camps ect that existed, just merely insinuating that the head of an organization that is clearly busy dealing with other things can't be responsible for his underling's actions. This would be the equivalent of going to war with china for being gun runners when its only the dictators subordinate that does it. Germany was weak so the world conspired to take them down before gaining too much power. And had Hitler not dissolved to alliance due to paranoia from schizophrenia, Nazis may have won.
0
0
Cookie Muncher NAPPY - 1726896538
no. Prior to the rise of Equality (MCs hero group) it allowed heroes to kill (even civilians) if it caused the success of bringing down a villain
After the rise of Equality, the leader advocated and brought forth a new regime of capture only. No killing allowed.
At the current moment, the MC resigned as a hero and became the prisoner guard in charge of execution (the only guard with the authority to kill by law)
0
0
complex but easy
Evil committed for survival (cannibalism when starving, murder for defense, ect) are evil not in nature and thus can return after some form of compensation depending on situation. It needs to be said that a rejection from society will force the same situation (making it impossible to find a job or shelter like the US does)
Evil committed as a nature doesn't know and therefore needs to be taught. It's impossible to expect someone to follow rules even if they think it's right if they have no morals. Teaching can last a lifetime if they can't grasp it
Evil committed on purpose is incurable. They would have made the same decision if they could turn back time except know how to not get caught.

These are the only possibilities of committing evil. BTW, MC right now is carrying out a sanctioned execution. They are all grouped (and pending the death penalty) and can therefore be called a terrorist group or army hostile to the nation. This is a war with their power the second they took off their suppression device
0
0
To briefly explain
Anything the government has access to the same applies to criminals (they dont follow laws anyways) which is why weapon BANS don make sense. Only restrictions do.
Having weapons in prison systems only give inmates access to them. In a situation where civilians aren't there, there is no justifiable use of DEADLY force. Instead, they are provided tools for suppression and non-lethal force.
The power situation went like this: doors are kept locked and opened via radio command. Power UNLOCKS the door meaning when power went out (now on) everybody was trapped on current floor. By the time power came back on, everyone had already removed the suppression device.
Lastly, given by the example of what was said, power level was redefined. This could be counted as removed but when addressing power it's important to classify weakness and strength, which was probably how it was changed for outliers like MC. In fact, the MCs power was why she decided the classifications needed to be changed

As for not assigning heroes to the prison, there is probably reasons due to fame/money
0
0
I get your need for running a train... But at this rate we are going to run out of floors and materials
0
0
Cookie Muncher Lucky13 - 1726888487
but batman killed joker
0
0
Cookie Muncher - 1726886919
finally see them playing hockey and its all caught up ugh
0
0