We literally saw Denji taken apart into pieces, put into different boxes, then put back together and he's fine. I'm also fairly certain Nayuta will be fine if she can be put back together.

https://i.postimg.cc/90sjm2L1/i.png
Dokko!

Vice. Wyze.
Between the two, Wyze is more unique and doesn't carry negative connotation; and the word "vice" has a common definition which means "an immoral or wicked behavior."

While I would prefer Wyze - pronounced "wise" -> ultimately, I don't really care as long as the translators stick to one.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Sometimes, you'll get far more than what you've bargained for.

Note: this is not aimed at that idiot, but his father who delegated this task to him.

True. I guess my attention was aimed at Denji and so my comment reflected that.

But yeah, depression isn't narrow. Apologies if I made it seem as such.

1 message in 2 minutes is really slow. Infuriatingly so. This message that you are reading right now has taken me like 15 seconds to type up.

Well... that's one way to get over your existential depression.

Depression sucks. If you're struggling to find a reason to live, then please get help. It isn't something that people can just get over on their own. Even Denji here got some help from Pochita.

I didn't expect Streek. I didn't really expect his teacher but I expected Streek even less. Wow.

Yeah. It isn't the translators doing a bad job. He just sucks at typing. lol

"Gray gold" = Salt.

True! Unironically, people used to wage war over this treasure called "salt." IRL, it feels like it was forever ago, as it happened in the 1870s, but nonetheless, it is a real war that happened.

Just a reminder that the Sword Saint/Star is really slow and bad at typing. In the novel, it took him 6 minutes to send 3 messages (full of typos too) back in the arc with the dwarves.

Uh... Well, that would explain his swing into depression.

This is indeed from this very same work. A few chapters after it came back from that long hiatus.

KISS KISS KISS
https://i.postimg.cc/90SDMwbh/i.png

Always a bag of mixed feelings. Welcome aboard the waiting train.

For what it is worth, FactCheck.org is not a government run website.

I wish you the best of luck.

https://i.postimg.cc/5tc693X9/i.png

Once again once again, you say "the evidence is out there" and yet it cannot be found nor can you provide any yourself.

It's funny how "my type" is the one that's so stubborn -> because my type requires evidence and proof.

Spoiler alert: the trees explode

Evidence. Proof.
The thing about evidence is that you can present it. It's clear, concise and obvious. For example, in a murder case, evidence that someone is the killer would be:
Footage of them doing the deed. The weapon (with a paper trail leading back to the culprit, or their fingerprints). Testimonies by witnesses.

If COVID-19 was grown in a lab Resident Evil-style, then there would be clear evidence. Where is it?

Furthermore, please do your own research, even if you just google it. Do the simple google search of "proof that covid19 is a bioweapon" and see the results.
Like Trevor Bedford, a virologist, who stated "There is no evidence whatsoever of genetic engineering that we can find”, and that, “The evidence we have is that the mutations (in the virus) are completely consistent with natural evolution."
Here's the article: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8266003/
Here's another: https://covid19.nj.gov/faqs/coronavirus-information/about-the-virus/is-covid-19-a-biological-weapon

Here's the factcheck for Fauci who is irrelevant: https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/the-wuhan-lab-and-the-gain-of-function-disagreement/
It's a long read, because there is so much conspiracy garbage out there, but it is pretty comprehensive about factchecking it by:
Taking a statement and who said it -> and tackling it directly. A lot of conclusions are literally "there is no evidence."

Two paragraphs above the "Gain-of-Function" starts with Fox News' statement and ends with: "There’s no evidence that the Wuhan laboratory, with or without funding from an NIH grant, created SARS-CoV-2."
The paragraph under it (right above the "Gain-of-Function" section) starts with Nicholas Wade (who is not a scientist) asserting two possibilities and ends with "It’s important to note that so far there is no direct evidence for either theory. Each depends on a set of reasonable conjectures but so far lacks proof." Yeah, Fox News took Wade's nonsense and spread it as gospel without a shred of evidence. Who would've thunk?

I doubt you'll read any of this, but hey, you can't say I didn't try.