Didn't MC kill Park Soochan?

Weird face on Seol talking about "scolding monsters"

Still don't know what you are talking about. You want to spam posts so you can downvote people? But that doesn't fit with what you said before.

Pretty sure it's a platypus, not a duck

I don't know what you're talking about. You never want to comment on MK again or something? Why should we care what last comment you make?

I don't remember who these people are except the fat one but it seems kind of dumb to leave them unguarded with only chains holding them.

I've forgotten who she is. "daughter of the noble who represents him" isn't enough to bring it back toe me. I guess she romantically likes MC?

meh

It's not a bad guess. My guess is that Erzebet will come along and secretly break the curse and take MC out of danger.

To help people who read this, when it says ""level limit" should actually say "level requirement"

Sure, though Helmet has tasted food before, assuming disgusting food as well and is not a previously emotionless robot.

Well there are contests of all sorts, including creative interpretation of agreements. Depends on what you value,

Well Alvin is anyway

The authors might not specifically thought of it in terms of capitalism. But that repeated sentiment about "choice" is too strong and otherwise out of place IMO to possibly be anything other than intentional.

A big lie the right wing side tells people is that everything must be perfect or it's not worth doing. They don't say those words, but they constantly imply it.

We don't need all those things exactly as I said. More tenant rights, rent increase caps, some public apartments being built, efforts to prevent mergers and monoplies, preventing investment capitalist from buying up so many apartment buildings or rigging rent through aps, etc. are all steps in the right direction that help people.

There are much smaller things we can start with that will still get alot of push-back

Imagine a massive amount of public/nonprofit apartments built. Quality put into construction. And proper maintenance and management for issues. Rent charged is ONLY enough to pay for maintenance plus a bit to pay off construction costs. Much better place to live at a much lower cost and homelessness would be cut down to next to nothing. Could even have programs for reduced or eliminated rent for those who can't afford it along with organizations to help with drugs and mental health.

But this would jeopardize the owner classes grip on power and money. Still worth trying to get.

Massive public transport. Completely electrified with trolleys and trains including between cities. Free at point of use. Massive reduction of parking, stroads, highways, etc. A much better place to live and much cheaper place to live. But profits of various companies would be threatened with this.

National healthcare, people going bankrupt for illness or being ripped off by insurance a thing of the past. Hospitals cheaper to run not having to have whole departments to deal with insurance. Price negotiations to keep costs down. People going to doctors for preventive care saving massive amounts of money, because it doesn't cost them.

Higher learning education as well. In the US, public schools not funded by local taxes for fair schooling.

The unrelenting unreasonable tax called "rent" itself is a capitalist gimmick to extract value from those underneath them. Most landlords do not "earn" the rent they charge. It's just the money they steal from people like a tax for themselves.

So you think the echos of the sentiments of the boss about Dad "choosing" to work to death and Mom "choosing" to have kids so therefore no allowances regarding rent have no meaning or significance?

You're projecting your ideas of "luck" and "human darkness" and "cycles of life and death" onto the story. It was not "luck" that caused Dad to work to death.

"reading compression classes"
LOL

What potential cost do you refer to?