You forgot to delete this one

Looks like he realized how dumb that comment was. Unfortunately, I copied it before he deleted it.

Here's what he initially said:
"ok this isn't even funny :(
I literally cant make a joke about this because this is so frankly unbelievable and plain wrong.

on the trans/gay part... do you believe in evolution? how about science?...
or y'know like... change at all?

gay/trans is a natural part of life and has been for all of evolution. because life at its most basic form is mitosis (I know you dont know what that means so look it up) the easiest step up on that chain is chain based mitosis (recreating with another one but using both as a harbor of life rather than one. but both have to be the SAME) you can trace this logic all up the evolutionary ladder to different species and all types of life.
just because something isn't normal for your limited perspective doesn't mean it isn't normal ever.

claiming that George Floyd didn't die is so insane it kinda hurts.
also did you not see the video? its footage that you can look at right now.
did the "woke media" fake it?
I cant even T-T

(not the Charlie Kirk part. allthough I don't consider him nice he by no means should have died, not even close.) (why am I justifying myself to you?)
(probably because I want to) (but then again I bet your going to insult me on self justification) (but it will be funny again)

(I'm done lol) (sorry for insulting you) (at least I can apologize for something I did wrong) (oh wait your perfect and should never have to apologize for insulting people) (sorry I forgot)"

This is what I was replying with before he deleted his comment:

"I really appreciate your concern for my education, no, seriously, I do. Really. But I think you should focus on your own lessons in logical consistency and rhetorical honesty first.

Do you not understand how ridiculous this sounds? Your retarded appeal to nature fallacy? That because something is 'natural' (like mitosis, or even disease and aggression, which are also 'natural'), it should be socially accepted as 'normal' behavior in a complex human society? That's a meaningless comparison.

Are you serious...? I never said George Floyd didn't die; I said he wasn't murdered. Read for a minute before posting- ah, wait, forgot that fact-checking isn't something the progressive left does. My mistake. Should've taken that into account.

No one cares if you 'literally can't make a joke' or why you feel the need to justify yourself with that retarded paragraph of self-pitying passive aggression. It does perfectly capture why this was all necessary, though. You're demonstrating exactly the kind of obnoxious, fact-free behavior I was talking about."

it is pretty funny watching someone say, 'It was just a joke' after they dropped a topic so toxic it derailed an entire comment section. You injected politics into a non-political comment section, and when you get pushback, you don't debate--you play the victim. You're a coward.

You literally said you were 'kinda baffled' by the criticism, which proves you didn't realize how irrelevant and obnoxious your 'silly joke' was until you had to deal with the consequences. So, yes, people are running with it, because you handed us a full ideological lecture disguised as an innocent, little XD. God, you people are awful, shameless, spineless losers. And people wonder why we hate the left. You're all like this.

Truly amusing when your immediate reaction is to act as if I've said something heinous and paint me as a villain rather than try to refute anything I've said. I've seen the same tactic used time and time again by the radical left, and it never ceases to amaze me how shameless you all can be.

That is an incredibly small minority, if you're talking about murder. I hate when people bring up statistical anomalies to prove a point.

I've seen my fair share of progressives on social media or otherwise who hate people who are "cis" or, in other words, normal, and call for their murders.

Did you see how many people on the left were calling for Charlie Kirk's murder and celebrating it when it happened? That dude is the nicest fucking person in the world, and they celebrated it. You didn't see the right protesting for their rights, did you? They weren't screaming oppression. It's almost funny. When Charlie was provably murdered by a radical leftist, you saw protests by the right. When George Floyd was "murdered" (Didn't actually happen,) there were riots by the left that caused billions in property damage.

Anyway, one tangent later--Discrimination against gay and trans people will never go away. Trans/gay** people are not normal, and normal people don't like it when other people aren't normal. It makes them uncomfortable. When I said they have to keep to themselves, I meant it literally... They have to accept that society will never accept them as normal--because they aren't, and they never will be.

It's certainly one of the reasons, and certainly a sufficient one, but not the only one. The issue is that you're making this about transgender people by mentioning gender surgeries and transitioning when the context has absolutely nothing to do with it. It's fucking obnoxious and retarded, you come off as a brainwashed (hence the pity) Gen-Z libtard.

I have nothing against people who want to be transgender, the same way I have no issues with gay people, as long as you keep to yourself.

I have an issue with people who base their entire personality on being transgender or gay, and feel the need to let everybody in the world know they're trans or gay. It's disgusting, period. I don't want to know about it, and I don't want to hear it. If you lot really "just want to be left alone" as so many of you claim, all you have to do is shut the fuck up, and you'd be left alone. Is it really that hard to understand?

You have mental issues

Skipping a couple of steps there, man. You fit none of those three, bro. I really pity you, dude.

The only appropriate response

And here I was expecting drama after he just kissed her right in front of him. I had my head in my hands and everything

...So she left him for no good reason 14 years ago, only to come back with a child from another man? I see so many comments talking about how much a loser the MC is - which he is - but I don't see nearly enough people talking about her.

What a fucking scumbag of a woman. Taking advantage of a single man who obviously has some lingering feelings for you. Does the author think he's sly, trying to camouflage this as something wholesome and romantic? How can anybody enjoy reading this?

To anyone who hasn't read up to the latest chapter and is hoping there's some twist - There isn't. That isn't the MC's child or something, her ex-husband passed away, and she's taking advantage of her ex. She's just a piece of shit.

Why does everyone want to fucking kill themselves?

Fun in the beginning, but it got boring and repetitive quickly. The novelty helped me persist, so I'll give it a 6/10.

If you're reading this for the 'Shoujo-ai' tag... don't. There's no actual romance of any kind, not sure why the tag's there in the first place. I can't recall even a single character saying they're gay. The most you'll get is some hugs.

Already? You oughta develop some tolerance for this stuff in this day and age.

I suppose you can spin it however you like, it's still mentally gay to transmigrate into a girl's body and develop romantic interest in a dude. Does his past life of however long he lived for as a male, suddenly disappear?

Unfortunately, I can't just forget the fact that the MC used to be male and enjoy it. If the author wanted to do that, I don't understand why he even added gender bender in the first place. Just makes me think the MC was a closeted homosexual.

I don't typically read hetero female MC books anyways, but books like this are even more not my thing.

https://i.postimg.cc/hGBm8B7W/i.jpg

Not like it's a super big spoiler. A quick glance at the comic/novel genres will show that it doesn't have the harem tag.

Whether your reply was intended for me or not doesn't matter -- you posted it, and people like me are going to respond.

You gave a vague, lazy answer full of half-spoilers and then told the guy to “be patient” when he followed up. That kind of condescending brush-off is exactly what I was calling out.

You claimed you didn’t want to explain out of laziness -- then why reply at all? You gave just enough info to seem like you were being helpful, then backed out the second it required any effort. That’s not lazy -- that’s just trying to seem knowledgeable without backing it up.

And then telling someone to “go research what you meant” after you’re the one who chose to respond? That’s ridiculous. If you didn’t want to explain, you should’ve just stayed silent. No one forced you to get involved, but once you did, don’t act surprised when people expect a real answer, not some half-assed teaser.

Yeah... Out of laziness, I'm sure.

You're right. You're not forced to, but you responded to me, and you felt the need to half-heartedly reply to him and give him vague answers. That ticks me off. If you "didn't want to explain," you should have just said nothing when he asked, but no. You gave him a lazy response, and when he asked you to elaborate, you said "be patient" as if he was gonna somehow be satisfied with that.

If you weren't prepared to explain anything, then why did you even bother responding to him in the first place?

No idea. That's definitely explained at some point, I think I just brushed over it.