Home
Latest update
Manga Directory
New Manga
Genres
4 koma
Action
Adult
Adventure
Artbook
Award winning
Comedy
Cooking
Doujinshi
Drama
Ecchi
Erotica
Fantasy
Gender Bender
Gore
Harem
Historical
Horror
Isekai
Josei
Loli
Manhua
Manhwa
Martial Arts
Mecha
Medical
Music
Mystery
One shot
Overpowered MC
Psychological
Reincarnation
Romance
School Life
Sci-fi
Seinen
Sexual violence
Shota
Shoujo
Shoujo Ai
Shounen
Shounen Ai
Slice of Life
Sports
Super power
Supernatural
Survival
Time Travel
Tragedy
Webtoon
Yaoi
Yuri
We also know the 9 whatever master was poisoned by someone and the personality of his disciple seems to match that of the 5 dragons disposition despite being in an organization where justice outweighs principal.
This hole thing reeks of conspiracy
But I'm glad you had fun. It really does make me feel good to know i managed to help people destress. It's not every day where you can get someone to search for information to debate instead of argue with names 😉
Btw meat eaters tend to not care about health unlike vegetarians. So they do risky activities like smoking, drinking, overeating, drinking soda, drinking coffee, inhaling concrete at jobs, inhaling spray paint at jobs or recreational painting (instead of wearing mask). These types of lifestyles will reflect higher health risks naturally. So for someone to get a sheet of paper that asks if they eat meat, there are other factor that led to low health. Maybe you are right maybe there are some added health risks but we can't identify it without a real longterm trial with a control. The point I'm trying to make clear is in the data it reflects "those who eat meat have..." vs what you've been twisting "eating meat causes..." There is a fundamental difference between those 2 statements. One suggests the root cause is eating meat where the other shows meat is present in more cases of the effect. This is why they say you can't simplify data. Because long term trials are impossible to run (funding issue), we get a different answer from meat is bad. You might as well say water consumption was present in 100% of cancer cases. Water causes cancer.
This is what I was trying to get you to realize.
What is the demographic of vegetarians vs omnivores. What kind of personalities and activities do they have. How is data collected for long term evaluation.
WHO has also passed a number of COVID vaccines, but imagine to everyones surprise when just 2 years later one of the brands were deemed unsafe. Organizations get together to push an agenda. They extrapolate data one-sidedly to make it look like what they say is credible. You know, before the earth rotated around the sun there were all kinds of "evidence" that it was the other way around... Because they only provided half truths.
Because you haven't thought critically once on who benefits from this, who supports it, how they gathered data, where the root data came from, the room of success on data that comes from lies and half-truths. Oh wait, I'll tell you since you don't seem to know. LONG TERM TESTS ARE GATHERED FROM QUESTIONAIRES. Where no room of control or integrity are upheld.
I'm done. You don't even know where the data comes from much less understand how to read the extrapolated data.
• moyang family kidnapped his masters daughter so he wiped the moyang family
• black merchants tried to attack his friends merchant group so he wiped 2 branches from existance
• namgoong family tortured his friend and tried to force his master's daughter in marriage so he killed all top brass in their own home
• remanents asked assassins to kill him and his friend and were directly annihilated
• noksam was sent after them and their patriarch was killed directly
They may not realize why but surely they understand killing those close will turn him into a ghost who will stop at nothing to wipe the organization right?
Humans have always used weapons and traps to hunt. And like what was said MANY times before, to eat meat did not mean every day for every meal. It is an opportunistic food source where nutrients are gained. Just like humans didn't eat berries on demand. They couldn't preserve them, nor did they farm them.
Past AND MODERN studies suggest wine has benefit to antioxidants, lipid regulation, and anti-inflammatory properties. (this is NOT A MISINTERPRETATION)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30487561/
Until you understand what a variable and control is in addition to where the data comes from, there is no point in arguing over the authenticity of long term results. It won't matter if you could site every legitimate study because there will be cause for false information through lies, food quality, and extenuating circumstances like health and lifestyle. This is the downside of not being able to fund a proper study which would still only be inclusive to one side. Ie too much protein (plant or meat) causes gall or kidney (too lazy to look up) stones but won't disclose that plants do as it isn't the target of the study.