Home
Latest update
Manga Directory
New Manga
Genres
4 koma
Action
Adult
Adventure
Artbook
Award winning
Comedy
Cooking
Doujinshi
Drama
Ecchi
Erotica
Fantasy
Gender Bender
Gore
Harem
Historical
Horror
Isekai
Josei
Loli
Manhua
Manhwa
Martial Arts
Mecha
Medical
Music
Mystery
One shot
Overpowered MC
Psychological
Reincarnation
Romance
School Life
Sci-fi
Seinen
Sexual violence
Shota
Shoujo
Shoujo Ai
Shounen
Shounen Ai
Slice of Life
Sports
Super power
Supernatural
Survival
Time Travel
Tragedy
Webtoon
Yaoi
Yuri
I'm normally pretty good with those things that are made up of letters and thatt you put side-by-side to form sentences, but this chapter was too much for my vocabulary. Couldn't choose.
I was just like ππ€ Mwah!
Fuck the what?
That was a knee-slapper and ΒΎ ππ
Plus, girl's got a heart even thiccer than her ass π₯°
Look at her! Believing in the kindhearted MC and vibing with the scary dude like that! LIKE A TINY GIRLBOSS!
It's no coinky-dink that we decided our abstract depiction of hearts should be shaped like butts.
It's because Compassion is BAE!!! π
Mwah! ππ€ ππ
I love the world and I love its people. I love clarifying things for whoever has a curiousity, comforting whoever has a worry, and vibing with whoever's feeling like being social.
There can never be "too much" kindess resonating between complete strangers who expect they'll never see each other again, where ulterior motives can more or less be ruled out, and sincerity is basically certainty.
I apologize for any discomfort you may be feeling, but I apologize out of compassion, not responsibility. I have done nothing wrong. Unity is meant to be, but it's happening too slowly imo. i'm pushing it βπ
My dude, I have probably touched more grass than you've seen. I've probably touched more grass than you've smelled.
I know you're used to arguing, because most people argue. But I'm not "most people." I won't defend against anything, because defense is for vulnerability, and I'm secure in myself. You know perfectly well why my use of the phrase "I won't presume" wasn't contradictory. You don't need this clarified either, but I'll say it for funsies. You're not the only person I'm talking to.
That was just information for you to have. I'm not antagonizing you. You push back because you perceived a push, but it was just plain help. I don't need gratitude or acknowledgement. I want you to be happy. If seeing me as something negative makes you happy, mission complete βπ
To clarify, I wasn't implying that you were contradicting the lore. The problem I was pointing out is your use of the word "slutty" appears to imply that you believe people's sexual activity is relevant to their social status or value as people. This is a counterproductive belief.
Key word is "appears". Because whatever conclusion someone comes to about you, even if it's inaccurate, that's effectively irrelevant, because people don't behave according to how the world is. They behave according to how they believe it is.
You absolutely can and will find yoursel disadvantaged because of other people's inaccurate judgment. If you want to have a comfortable life, sometimes you need to compensate for other people's shortcomings. Be a team player, basically.
IF (big "if") you happen to have interest in dating girls, you gotta get your mind right. They do look out for each other. If you're overheard saying anything like "Slutty thotty" it's already over, at least with locals.
Guys who think they can get away with being like that tend to say stuff like "Why do girls assume the worst so much? Y'all don't know me." But it's like bro, yes they do know you. If you're blacklisted they don't need to meet you directly.
Plus, sexuality-based stigma is some of the most overtly illogical social stuff I've ever seen. It's a conflict of interest to try and make someone feel wrong for being sexual if you're hoping they will be with you. Like, that doesn't math. What is the logic?
I honestly still can't believe my eyes when I see this happen, no matter how many times. Unless someone's ace or celibate, we ALL want it. Why are we discouraging something we all want!? Like, do I go into a restaurant hungry and be like "Only losers cook and sell food."
Seriously, what even is this??? We got billions of people to collaborate with on streamlining our social stuff for comfort, and THIS is what we got goin' on??? People haven't corrected this cycle after hundreds of thousands of years???
Because it is a cycle. It's a-spinnin'.
Kinda like this π Except it's not fun, nor is it adorable.
https://i.postimg.cc/8zTYx5GR/i.gif
This counterproductivity is superhuman, my dude. Can I get a hand with it, maybe??? Anyone??? ππ₯² I don't mean actually touch my hand. Ya probably shouldn't. Just stop sabatoging your own happiness.
If you're ace or celibate then I get it. Not your problem. But like most people, I'm a ginormous perv. I'm just abnormally honest about it.
I'm doin' alright. Definitely not starving, I'm married and active bedroom, but I'd rather also be a serial fucker and have nobody bat an eye at it because they understand those feelings are as normal as hunger and it doesn't mean I'm not in love, and have everyone else be just as happy as me because they're too satisfied to get mad. Then maybe we can stop hating each other over crap that doesn't matter. That'd be neat π€·
I'm like was this an unforeseen complication??? Is she improvising??? π This is the oldest girl in the harem, she's a third year and the school has always had athletic stuffs. Those big boobs didn't arrive in the mail yesterday girl you looked exactly the same in the first year flashbacks π€£
She's such a deep thinker too, so I was like, she never ran before? π€ But then after she wins, she thinks "Nobody beats me when I go almout at athletics! πͺπ"
That's not criticism, Bt-dubs. I've never cared much about plausibility in storytelling. I think people who are genuinely critical of it are stressing themselves out, and they should try to focus on being entertained.
Life is hard enough when we have obligations, so I'm not tryna have my recreational time tainted. I'm sure if I was a published author I wouldn't be diligent about plot holes at all. I'd probably be famously lackadaisical about it, actually.
I've imagined being on a panel at a convention and hearing "If magic wands change loyalty just from someone being disarmed, and that affects performance, how does anyone's wand still work??? You introduced expelliarmus in the 2nd book and every character has used it."
I'd be suckin' on a Pocky stick like it's a cigarette and be like "Bruh I didn't make up that wand loyalty mess until I was like, halfway done with book 7 π€· I thought I was only writing one book. Plus I was high as a kite the whole time. Why do you still like me anyway? I'm a ginormous bigot. How tf am I still getting invited to stuff? π€£"
There is no "Nobody can catch me" factor anywhere in this.
In order to get caught, you have to do something wrong.
I.π
Have.π
Done.π
Nothing.π
Wrong.π
There is nothing to catch.
All I ever do is talk to people. Explain things. It's not just kids, it's everyone, but "everyone" includes kids. I'm not gonna ignore someone who's in distress just because a third person may think it's suspicious to talk to them.
If you genuinely care about victims, suspect all you want. When someone goes digging, it's not what they're looking for that matters. It's what they find. If you're a genuine protector, the closer you look at me, the better you're gonna feel.
But if you're doing the usual thing and just visualizing monsters in order to feel less monstrous yourself, the truth about me is not gonna make you feel better. Seeing the "designated villain" trope from fiction has been implemented IRL and that it fooled pretty much everyone even though it was paper thin is gonna be unpleasant to say the least.
People visualize others as being bad because of relativity. They feel bad about themselves, so they alleviate that by finding someone who they can perceive as being worse. It's comforting, but there are healthier forms of comfort. Once someone understands their existence is inherently valid, they stop doing that. βπ
There is no supervisor and no position. My wording was vague for a reason. It's not my job, it's my purpose. I do it everywhere I go, and nobody else has a say in it, because I don't break any rules. Ever.
There have been what I suspect were entrapment attempts, but I don't care. Bait is only dangerous if I take it, and I never will. I teach them everything they need to know about safety regarding this kinda thing. I tell them not to trust me, I tell them what grooming is, teach them about metadata and other tracking methods. I don't praise or compliment them.
If I know their parent and I see anything concerning, like if they mention having a phone when I don't think they should, I tell the parent. If they're old enough to have a phone, I tell them phone numbers can be used to track locations, so nobody needs that number just for socializing.
There's other methods for being in contact with someone that are safer. I teach them all about safety, local and internet. I protect them. I'm a sheep in wolf's clothing. Sometimes I feel like I can SEE the frustration in grateful replies because they were sure I was bad, but I'm not π
I don't need help. I am help. I didn't make this mess, but I'm gonna clean it up. For everyone.
Don't sweat that target on my back, my dude. It's there because there's nothing to defend βΊ You don't carry a tower shield onto a battlefield and then stick your bare hand out in front of it. The shield is supposed to get hit. βΊπ€
I see the world for what it is. I know nobody's actually a bad person, people only do bad things because they're uncomfortable, and comfort is all anyone really wants. My sense of self-worth is maxed out, so I'll be the lightning rod for their hatred. If they won't listen to any wisdom, then at least they can get some aggression out of their system. Their next target wont get it as bad. May even be spared. No cost to me.
It's not even kindness, if you really think deep about it. Just math. Efficiency. Better me than someone who's vulnerable, because minus zero is less of a loss than minus any positive number π
I got this ππ
Unfortunately, as soon as I saw them put "manic state" in quotes as if you were using some kind of figurative speech, I started thinking this is gonna be difficult. But I'll always try.
They don't even know what a pedophile is. Probably don't know what mania is. I'm not saying they're dumb, either. It's an education thing. Psychology is left out of many curriculums, so this isn't common knowledge. That's a failure of the society, not the individual. I'll teach it to them they'll listen.
That's hitting a turtle on the shell, my dude π
But like everyone else I meet, you will get from me whatever you seem to need. It's not contingent on how you treat me. I don't think you need to be antagonized.
First, you deserve better than whatever your circumstances are. I don't need to know you in order to say that. It applies to everyone. I know you're not a bad person, because I know bad people don't exist. All antagonistic behavior is born of discomfort.
Second, I do not defend against personal attacks, and I don't deny allegations or accusations. I am secure in myself. That's not an achievement, it's just a decision. It's a decision you can make for yourself today.
By showing you a member of the most unanimously hated group of people in the world, with the most heavily stigmatized interest can still be kind in the face of adversity, and not need validation, by extension I teach you something priceless.
My gift to you is the wisdom to understand that you can do the same. No matter how bad someone wants you to feel about what you are, and no matter how valid their concerns may be, it only hurts if you let it.
"Shaming" is not a thing. Feeling shame is an individual decision. You cannot manually invoke feelings of shame in someone else. You can only manipulate them into making that decision for themselves. And only if they let you. This goes both ways.
That'll do wonders for your mental health and overall long-term wellbeing, which will influence your behavior, which will influence everyone you meet. That's worth more to me than anything that happens between the two of us ββΊ
Unless someone's your partner, employer, parent, or for whatever other reason their favor affects your longterm wellbeing, it doesn't matter if they think you're a serial killer or a messiah. I'm not saying they don't matter. I'm saying you don't have to let them hurt you. Let go of the perceived need to fit in.
So you can take those emotional shackles off now that you know they've always been bracelets. After you stop treating expectations like rules, be more fair to yourself, and get used to feeling happier, I've got a lot more information for you.
You don't know what a pedophile is, you don't know what cowardice is, and you don't know what morality is. That might sound disrespectful, but it's really not. You're in the majority on all three. Most people don't understand those things.
You've also misunderstood some of the things I said, but clarifying them may be interpreted as being defensive, which I don't do. Defense is for vulnerability. I can clarify, but I won't defend. I've done nothing wrong, so there's no vulnerability to defend.
Societal stigma can bite my ass. Laws can bite my ass. Idgaf. I do wtf I want, and I wanna do good.
Those are countermeasures against people who have bad intentions. I don't.
The only thing in the world that's truly wrong is harm. Cringe isn't harm. I'm a saint. I don't hurt people. Anyone would be safe with me, regardless of vulnerability.
But being with me wouldn't be the problem. Being without me is when the problems would start. Unlike in age-appropriate dating, that'd be all but inevitable.
People think age gap dating is wrong because they assume I'll exploit someone. They draw that line because they think a younger person doesn't have a fair chance of seeing it coming, while an older one can fairly be blamed for falling for it.
Bullshit. Vulnerability doesn't justify exploitation. Idgaf how old anyone is, if I exploited them, that'd be 100% my fault. The issue with age gap dating is and always has been the difference in lifespan.
We could be just as healthy as an age-appropriate couple. We could. But decisions should be made with risk/reward ratio in mind. You don't increase your risk if it won't increase your reward. The reward of love is a constant. The risk varies.
She can get the same reward with someone her own age, but with me her risk is higher. She'd spend more time as a widow than someone my own age. After a lifetime of always having been taken care of, never having to fend for herself, she'd feel alone for the first time when she's old.
As an elder it's my responsibility to see that for what it is if she doesn't. I date because I love the world and I want people to be happier. Even if I did everything right with her while alive (and I would) that would still be more harm than good in the long run. That's cruel.
That's why this lolicon is harmless. I love little girls. Key word is "LOVE". Keeping them from loving me is the best thing I can do, because it saves them from missing me. It's a LOT easier since lolis are a cruelty-free substitute. It's not a gateway. It's better. From the bottom of my heart, I'm happy.
Bt-dubs, I don't avoid kids IRL. I'm basically a volunteer guidance counselor. A cat is protecting your mice, because someone makes sure it's never hungry. Meow Mix doesn't have bones or poop in it, so why tf would I wanna gag on a whole-ass mouse when I can crawch-mawnch on a symphony of flavors?
Pass. ππ
Arigatou, Japan! βπ₯°
I'm high-key starting to believe there's never been anything inherently negative about any form of perversion and that if people just had harmless outlets that were gratifying enough, the world would get SO much better.
Ehh, that was a somewhat dishonest statement. The whole truth is that's a bulletproof fact, the most relevant truth in the world, I've understood it for a long time, and that's why I'm an implausibly virtuous person with an ocean of good deeds even though I like little girls and 99.99999% of the world thinks that makes me evil.
Anyone who thinks a dirty mind outweighs clean hands has not got a healthy mind. Treating this kinda thing like it's the same as the crimes is like treating angry thoughts like it's the same aa physical violence. That level irrationality is absolutely terrifying. But I'm not mad. I know the real reason why they do it.
I'm the sheep in wolf's clothing, and I didn't make this mess, but I'm gonna clean it up. For everyone βπ₯°
Just remember when it feels like the world's been turned upside-down, that's not what happened.
It was upside-down when I GOT here. I'm gonna turn it rightside-up! βπ₯°
I think it's a healthy lesson that someone doesn't need to be the biggest badass in the room to be a leader, but it's healthiest for people to settle their own beefs whenever possible.
Winning with help is better than dying, fuck all that honorable death mess, but yeah a 1v1 win woulda been better.
Our consciousnesses would both effectively be like 50+ years old by the time we met, and we'd have seen each other's circumstances, and seen the same world develop so differently based on one change.
If there's STILL not enough wisdom and perspective between the TWO of us to understand how the world actually works... How fragile life is, that evil has never existed, that people only hurt each other out of discomfort, and that we're all on the same team and we always have been... Neither of us are main character material. Re-write the story at that point π
It's taken me (one person with one story from one world on one timeline) less than half a lifetime to figure that out IRL. I ain't even middle aged. Out here livin' like a saint but still lookin' like a snack so yummy it'll spoil yo dinner before you even had lunch. ππ€£
Fiction oughta be better than reality
https://i.postimg.cc/pX3cPqC1/i.gif
It just seemed to follow logically to both of them that since they woke up as the person they were just fighting, it was the most likely possibility.
They haven't seen each other, but they both found out through research that their old self exists and has changed their name to their accurate one. So they've both known for awhile.
"I mean, not at the exact same time. In the same session tho. Yuppers! :3 "