Spent a fair amount of time listening to people whom are passionate about the topic. Though I would also say a lot of it stems from the "why do anime characters look 'White'?" question, and understanding why people would think that. (I truly thing think most of the reason why is that the faces are too "long" with chins/jaw are too narrow and that more aligns with Caucasian than Asian when it is the default. Obviously there is more to it, but the is the basis to my understanding)

I have also just been curious about things from the start of life, and paid attention to various things and remembered them - Accuracy/Correctness not Guaranteed

I do not get how you can not understand something so basic?

I do not get how you are missing the point of this, the question is implied... this should be basic Grade 9 or 10 English at the most extreme end of things.

It is like going to a family member's place and go into the freezer without asking and getting an Ice-cream Sandwich. If you come back into the room and the say: "someone made themselves right at home didn't they." or "you only grabbed one." you might need to hear the tone of what was said to know what they mean. But do they actually have to say explicitly "wtf why are you going into my freezer and just taking stuff without asking?" or once again explicitly say "where is mine?".

Not sure what else to say without devolving into... some kind of internet based insult? MEME? a keyboard something or another? ahh perhaps best term would be caricature? (had to look up the spelling on that one, ben far too long from the last time I wrote instead of saying it) If all the MEME and recycled content on the internet could help save the world the world would have been saved several times over by now.

Enigmo
"Mr shakespeare over hear tryna sound all intellectual with his shit when the original statement doesnt even make sense with a question mark. Its supposed to be a simple statement. Fucking Goober"

I do not even know if this warrants a rude reply, appears you were already having a hard time with things at that moment.

To help you out:
- Shakespeare was famous for his Playwright activities not technical analyses (even one as low class as the one I made) .
- the "original statement" was made in a "vacuum" it does not have the proper context in its framework to just assume all peoples would understand it as it was meant .
- The fact that I did not perceive it as a simple statement, as you said it should be, is a single point of proof that it failed as a so called 'simple statement'. (the other follow comment verifies my lack of uniqueness in that conclusion)

While I will agree that the sentence does not do well with a '?' as punctuation - I was not the one that made that inquiry; I forgive you for the blunder though, it happens to the best of us.

I vaguely remember as a wee child a Teacher once told me: "If you do not finish a sentence you are leaving it open and just like a door if you leave it open you can't be surprised when someone walks inside and makes a mess.".

------
All that potentially passive aggressive nonsense to say: It is not as clear of a statement as you claimed it to be. English has many implied meanings. If you say: "I do not get" that implies that what follows is a question, even if you treat it as a statement. If it is not meant to be a question then the most likely other meaning is that it is said to end that point of conversation. As it is basically the core/start of an original, individual comment it is obviously not going to be the latter.

Also as was (at least I thought was) clearly stated, I started off with 'if it was an open statement'. That literally means that I recognized that it was possible that it was truly just a statement for a second time. I provided an explanation for prosperity sake on the unlikely remote possibility that it was an actual question and to also throw something out there if someone else saw the comment and genuinely thought it was a question and would have liked an answer as well.

Comments in the comment section or personal not private an often forgotten point.

Though for a second there I thought you were possibly a troll of sorts, En-ig-mo was hitting far too close to ignoramus like a play on An-ig-no in stead of the much more likely Enigma but with a 'o' instead of an 'a' compounded by the over use abbreviations sense the 2000s. English really is too messy of a language

I really feel this one... Are there innocent people remaining in the sect, is he just trying to upgrade the system reward again?

If it is just for a reward it would feel dirty. I did not get the vibe he was being through for any proper reasons - feels like he is faffing around like it is still a game and not his current reality.

Are the panels in the book, on the desk, in page three a reference to something?

At first I thought it was some kind of Zootopia reference but after a second look I am not too confident... looks like a Fox Person and that was all that came to mind. I also first thought the bottom left panel was a rabbit, but second look also made that feel like I got that wrong...

"Edge Lord flavoured" honestly feels like the best description for this... just go at it like a comedy and/or slice of life.

I was absolutely getting the 'written by a 13yr old' vibes. Like the MC's coat should have MR. BADAZZ written on it - because everyone needs to know he is super COOL[edgy].

The comments about it being 'cliché' are rather apt though, I can even agree with them. Sadly though it feels like they are "right" but I still want to say generic expectation resulted in generic conclusions. 99% could just be that I am tired, and its failure to claim that serious tone just makes it mostly funny to read...

They really focus on humor rather than outright comedy.

That is basically the feeling I had.

The big problem was that I saw them post this exact same nonsense of a comment on another series.

If everyone spotted it for what it was at first glance, no issues. Sadly they do not see it for what it is because the deception needs you to analyze it at least a bit.

Giving it a bit of a think, and now correct me if I am wrong - I think they are actually a Troll poster. [assuming it is true that they have done this in more than one place and is equally or more so "wrong" and saying things that do not make sense]

I appreciate that.

It is a worthwhile thing to expose such dishonest behaviour. Intentionally done or not, it should not be given a free pass. Best case scenario; we learn, grow, and become better people.

My 'side' though is the one where we wait for the questions to be answered, the points to be addressed. It is that they rarely ever are, it is just silence and disappearances. If anything I think that is what I want other to see and understand.

Our common ground is frustration. Frustration for those that can never address the point of an argument, can never seemingly answer simple questions. All they seem to have is Shaming Insulting Guilting Name-calling, nothing the proves their point; they have nothing but some "buzzwords" to try and whip up some irrational outrage so they can keep avoiding the point.

At times I do feel like that Madman that sat down to play chess with a Pigeon, this kind of thing may actually be quite accurate to the saying.

...apologies for the ramblings. Hope you are doing well!

When something reaches the point where its own name is basically the only thing that can describe it... a majestic horror of duality.

A real good flashback, such a rare thing. Feels good to experience it done right! especially when they are done so dirty so often.

Good Things Deserve Good Vibes! *Vibes Sent!

All very good/solid points.

The only "correction" I would put to that is that - the 'thing I am hung up on' is that the statements made are Lies, they are simply not true and provably so.

So I guess you are absolutely right in that when people defend and want to suck down the lies being fed to them like a holy scripture and relentlessly defend it, it disgusts me. It is the same behaviour that people use to justify CP and other things of that nature. Obtusely ignoring the point of the arguments being made while trying to drag the conversation with things that are considered outliers to the topic but are not related to the point itself.

I guess you can say that is an over analyzation.
I should have just said that Loading is a Troll and is Gaslighting the comments with his so called "opinions", cause obviously a lot of his "opinions" are in the $h|t that never happened category.

-----

I could have continued my idiocy from what is almost yesteryear at this point, but being a Man is about controlling your feelings to the highest degree and owning the mistakes that you have made. Learn, Improve, Keep Pushing. As a Man I constantly need to push myself to be refined as a person even if that is only done for me, after all everything that happens to me is my fault.

Like how we ended up here: I said some poorly put together things that generated a comment thread. I followed up on another person's comment and that opened the floor to you to make an arguable back-handed comment about my person. Was your reply an attack of sorts, sure. As it turns out you can make a well put together reply and it is top tier, at least I would say it is. The only issue that remains in my mind is how you came to post your first comment. You can say that it was just matching energy for energy, I will accept that. The thing that does you a disservice is your lack of supporting points, even if those points are to refute my own points. I would actually prefer that you refute points specifically, because they are the proof that Loading is a Liar and no one wants to address that specifically.

The kicker for all of this, if I convince anyone by using facts to see reason and become neutral in the arguments, I have done a service for the community. If I turn a person to my side to call me out when I do wrong but will support truth above everything else then that is a win for the community and those that do good for the community are doing good for me. You can straight hate my guts for no reason and that is perfectly fine, hell it would even say it is amazing in it's own right - as long as it is not a lie, we are good.

Well... depressed is accurate. But you got me right confused, a troll, highly autistic? Please explain how you came to that realm of conclusion?

Though you are half right in a way. Instead of foaming at the mouth though it can be said talking to people does drive a portion of my depression; I mean it is truly incredible that people consistently miss the point of statements as if it is the sole reason they exist. They just parrot things repeatedly even if those things are proven false, repeatedly. It is like interacting with an NPC. They say something really interesting or not so much and when asked more about it their programming fails. Then they get upset and just toss insult or try to label others as an ~ism of some sort so they do not have to be held to account or explain; much better than just becoming outright violent I guess?

The problem is the simplification: Loading will say something in the spirit of: That person is such a bad driver, they even have history of being in a car accident. That is what they will say, but in reality (of this fake example) the driver will be below average or average driver most days and will have a bad run of things every few months and the accident they were in was because someone else ran a Red Light or a Stop Sign and crashed into the side of their vehicle when they had 'right of way'.

This is what I feel is the nuance that is being lost, mostly my own fault on this one, I admit once again. My 'Problem' is that between the start and the end of they story is where these "opinion" they lie to you.

The supporting points are proof in themselves. He is not a devil but not an angel either, he is abusive but also kind, not the strongest but not the weakest either, not eccentric but not normal either.
does Devilish and Angelic like actions = being bland/indecisive?
abusive but also kind = just regular people things?
not the Strongest but not the weakest = average at everything?
not eccentric but not normal = ???; what does this even mean - does an odd things from time to time?

Follows that up with: "Basically you can replace the protagonist with a cardboard cutout and no one will notice the difference"

It is just... I do no know. To me personally? These are acting like describing the Short-Tall man that is a 2 handed, 2 legged, average person with no presence. It mixes things that only hold up on the face of it; there is a massive difference between Angel and Demon behaviour, you can have both in the same person. You can not how ever have a Short-Tall person{without defining outside factors [like short to an adult, tall to a child] , not explaining those factors before hand... I would call that dishonest; especcially if it was integral to the point}

You were absolutely right in many ways; I said a lot , so that I could basically say nothing.

What I should have said is something along the lines of:
Loadings points have a point of contradicting themselves (here and elsewhere), and from reading other reviews from Loading they state their "opinions" as if they are facts that should justify the opinions themselves. The issues is these opinion at best are misunderstood or worse just outright not accurate and they a habit of basing these opinion/facts on things that appear to be a twisted reality or outright misunderstood.

To be negative about it: They have successfully lied and tricked you. The Bloat explains what I mean in more detail.

Bloat is in a follow-up comment.

Loading gives their "opinion" but state it as if it were facts and if they are to be taken as facts then they are provably wrong - that is the problem.

Sure the reply was childish, I will accept that wholeheartedly. Just tell me in what way it was inaccurate? Maybe I can do better, if someone actually did...that would be something. The problem here is Loading likes to go around and pretend that their opinion is expressed as an opinion; in multiple places (at least 2), leading many people astray.

If you recognize their handle and generally agree with their tastes, that is awesome for you. It is just a lack of empathy to think everyone thinks the same way. I am not even saying the story great read or a bad read for you - just do not allow others to make things up and/or give their negative slanted (false) information to try and ruin what others may like.

Niafloa said:
Thanks for the review, guys like you help save time for people who doesn't want to invest their time reading something they might not like. Just ignore the other dude xD

The key here is: "might not like"; it is being done dirty when Loading violates that trust by giving false/inaccurate information.

But after looking at it again I was being an emotional Twat at the time, that was my bad. Though I will stand behind saying Loading is untrustworthy; their negative points do not match reality at least in how they overly simplify the things they say.

Even if we agree on the start and ending, a STORY is about how you get there; that is (for me at the very least) the whole point of reading something. So to be dishonest about that...

MC feels like he has just become a fool, it is like he is just being pushed along with 1/100 on the self agency scale. It is really got me at a point where I just feel like everything should match up and make sense. It just does not, it is like one of the face pictures where the eyes and mouth are in the wrong spots but looks right till you notice the head itself is upside-down.

Maybe it would have been better to say: MC feels like he is becoming more and more of an imposter that does not fit in this story...

I can agree whole heartedly with that!

It has been so long but I feel like the 'Severed Hand' thing was actually legit. So it was truly written in with intent if so...

But sadly this feels like it is just constantly missing the mark and the vibe has been killed, cause the whole hand thing should be brilliant it has the hallmarks of a great setup. Ahhh it just hit me; the vibe has become the same as when someone tries to tell a joke but botches the Punch-Line massively, so it should have been funny but was smothered in the cradle with roadkill from a couple cities away.

I am nearly certain those 2 "knights" committed Lese Majeste, twice over possibly. They effectively insulted a representative of a Foreign King, and denounced the Kings official documents as forgeries. On the other side they threaten the wellbeing of their own Royalty attempting to drive away an individual that brought requested medical ingredients... If this was not a lighthearted story, they would not even have gotten the dignity of being put in the dirt.

I was mildly let down at the revenge.
It missed that poetic mark by not loading her up with the poison to quote 'Honor' her parents death.
A few needles to the eyes slash face before the heart stab would have made it more "right" in my mind. Especially after emphasizing on Fighting Dirty.