The Sects are being slaughter in a wave like method (if I recall correctly). They would have their main attack forces coming from one direction with secret clean up forces hiding on the other side of their target. I also seem to recall that the Common People would takes days to weeks to travel a Cultivators hours to days of travel. The next place to report to would be wiped out before they ever arrived.

Did they have Long Distance Communications, I really do not remember - there was the Gem thing for the top disciples but none of them were present(?), might be a super high level/ power thing, but there is also the players (and the Forums/discussion board). So ya, it really does make no sense that it has not been reported and news of it is not everywhere.

I really overlooked that point if it was not point out as impossible somewhere...

Absolutely, I was likely reading into it in a way I do not currently recall. If they had said it would suck to give up the body but reasonable overall; that would have been one thing. But this is more like saying: "you want that with or without the trash bag?"

I agree sacrificing the living for the dead makes no sense - minus situations where said living is a traitor, the cause of the dead, etc. - this type of situation is just not something that can be treated like a simple transaction that has no feelings behind it. That is why I would say you point holds merit and the "Bro, it is just a dead body." leads to exactly what I said.

I would say that, while there are similarities to that example. It is is not similar enough to be properly compared. The story's situation can be argued as "Therapy" towards acceptance.

As where your cop scenario can be a justified evil, straight evil, or a myriad of other things based on the specific situation. I would say for the most part: be innocent and do not lie to the Cops, and you should never have an issue with a proper honest cop, and if they are not proper/honest then what you did never mattered in the first place. If things never mattered or were irrelevant, then the original question invalidates itself.

This is like straight up Bipolar. Basically a Master-Class in how to do a High-Octane Slow-Life story.

Chapters are short but felt paced perfectly with no useless bloat panels, hit that blasted grey box all too soon...Unless the story has negative interest for you, well even then I would suggest a click.

Sadly we all know what is likely to happen...though I will agree if you wanna say: the overwhelming number of MCs that are overly nice/dense or really just come off as cuckholds with plot armour is taking its toll on my spirit.

I really liked how it was setting itself up as a small cast Loner/Nomad at the start, then it just feels as if I was lied to. The expectation that was set up in my mind was betrayed.

I put this down for a long time and come back, and it morphed into some sappy come together as a community to save the world and friendship is the ultimate power like a five year-old's Sunday Cartoon...
Now this would not be an issue if it was on the "cover", but it is not.

Also it feels like a third to half of what is posted as a of chapter 63 is a single, mostly ongoing fight against a single so overwhelming powerful, that it is basically slapping around plot armour that just can not be stopped; till you never give up, and friendship a win...

It is like two different stories...and the second one hijacked the first. It is the proverbial Bait-and-Switch that is rubbing me all kinds of wrong. Both kinds of stories can be awesome, but if you are promising steak give steak, not tofu with steak juice synthetic flavouring.

Possible plot hole, but I think there is also a chance that because the Murder System was not active there was no negative/positive with that and the point gain was a separate system.

I say that personally thinking it is kinda dumb if true, like using a paper bag as a water bottle, But 2-day concrete bunker is a thing here so...

Spent a fair amount of time listening to people whom are passionate about the topic. Though I would also say a lot of it stems from the "why do anime characters look 'White'?" question, and understanding why people would think that. (I truly thing think most of the reason why is that the faces are too "long" with chins/jaw are too narrow and that more aligns with Caucasian than Asian when it is the default. Obviously there is more to it, but the is the basis to my understanding)

I have also just been curious about things from the start of life, and paid attention to various things and remembered them - Accuracy/Correctness not Guaranteed

I do not get how you can not understand something so basic?

I do not get how you are missing the point of this, the question is implied... this should be basic Grade 9 or 10 English at the most extreme end of things.

It is like going to a family member's place and go into the freezer without asking and getting an Ice-cream Sandwich. If you come back into the room and the say: "someone made themselves right at home didn't they." or "you only grabbed one." you might need to hear the tone of what was said to know what they mean. But do they actually have to say explicitly "wtf why are you going into my freezer and just taking stuff without asking?" or once again explicitly say "where is mine?".

Not sure what else to say without devolving into... some kind of internet based insult? MEME? a keyboard something or another? ahh perhaps best term would be caricature? (had to look up the spelling on that one, ben far too long from the last time I wrote instead of saying it) If all the MEME and recycled content on the internet could help save the world the world would have been saved several times over by now.

Enigmo
"Mr shakespeare over hear tryna sound all intellectual with his shit when the original statement doesnt even make sense with a question mark. Its supposed to be a simple statement. Fucking Goober"

I do not even know if this warrants a rude reply, appears you were already having a hard time with things at that moment.

To help you out:
- Shakespeare was famous for his Playwright activities not technical analyses (even one as low class as the one I made) .
- the "original statement" was made in a "vacuum" it does not have the proper context in its framework to just assume all peoples would understand it as it was meant .
- The fact that I did not perceive it as a simple statement, as you said it should be, is a single point of proof that it failed as a so called 'simple statement'. (the other follow comment verifies my lack of uniqueness in that conclusion)

While I will agree that the sentence does not do well with a '?' as punctuation - I was not the one that made that inquiry; I forgive you for the blunder though, it happens to the best of us.

I vaguely remember as a wee child a Teacher once told me: "If you do not finish a sentence you are leaving it open and just like a door if you leave it open you can't be surprised when someone walks inside and makes a mess.".

------
All that potentially passive aggressive nonsense to say: It is not as clear of a statement as you claimed it to be. English has many implied meanings. If you say: "I do not get" that implies that what follows is a question, even if you treat it as a statement. If it is not meant to be a question then the most likely other meaning is that it is said to end that point of conversation. As it is basically the core/start of an original, individual comment it is obviously not going to be the latter.

Also as was (at least I thought was) clearly stated, I started off with 'if it was an open statement'. That literally means that I recognized that it was possible that it was truly just a statement for a second time. I provided an explanation for prosperity sake on the unlikely remote possibility that it was an actual question and to also throw something out there if someone else saw the comment and genuinely thought it was a question and would have liked an answer as well.

Comments in the comment section or personal not private an often forgotten point.

Though for a second there I thought you were possibly a troll of sorts, En-ig-mo was hitting far too close to ignoramus like a play on An-ig-no in stead of the much more likely Enigma but with a 'o' instead of an 'a' compounded by the over use abbreviations sense the 2000s. English really is too messy of a language

I really feel this one... Are there innocent people remaining in the sect, is he just trying to upgrade the system reward again?

If it is just for a reward it would feel dirty. I did not get the vibe he was being through for any proper reasons - feels like he is faffing around like it is still a game and not his current reality.

Are the panels in the book, on the desk, in page three a reference to something?

At first I thought it was some kind of Zootopia reference but after a second look I am not too confident... looks like a Fox Person and that was all that came to mind. I also first thought the bottom left panel was a rabbit, but second look also made that feel like I got that wrong...

"Edge Lord flavoured" honestly feels like the best description for this... just go at it like a comedy and/or slice of life.

I was absolutely getting the 'written by a 13yr old' vibes. Like the MC's coat should have MR. BADAZZ written on it - because everyone needs to know he is super COOL[edgy].

The comments about it being 'cliché' are rather apt though, I can even agree with them. Sadly though it feels like they are "right" but I still want to say generic expectation resulted in generic conclusions. 99% could just be that I am tired, and its failure to claim that serious tone just makes it mostly funny to read...

They really focus on humor rather than outright comedy.

That is basically the feeling I had.

The big problem was that I saw them post this exact same nonsense of a comment on another series.

If everyone spotted it for what it was at first glance, no issues. Sadly they do not see it for what it is because the deception needs you to analyze it at least a bit.

Giving it a bit of a think, and now correct me if I am wrong - I think they are actually a Troll poster. [assuming it is true that they have done this in more than one place and is equally or more so "wrong" and saying things that do not make sense]

I appreciate that.

It is a worthwhile thing to expose such dishonest behaviour. Intentionally done or not, it should not be given a free pass. Best case scenario; we learn, grow, and become better people.

My 'side' though is the one where we wait for the questions to be answered, the points to be addressed. It is that they rarely ever are, it is just silence and disappearances. If anything I think that is what I want other to see and understand.

Our common ground is frustration. Frustration for those that can never address the point of an argument, can never seemingly answer simple questions. All they seem to have is Shaming Insulting Guilting Name-calling, nothing the proves their point; they have nothing but some "buzzwords" to try and whip up some irrational outrage so they can keep avoiding the point.

At times I do feel like that Madman that sat down to play chess with a Pigeon, this kind of thing may actually be quite accurate to the saying.

...apologies for the ramblings. Hope you are doing well!

When something reaches the point where its own name is basically the only thing that can describe it... a majestic horror of duality.

A real good flashback, such a rare thing. Feels good to experience it done right! especially when they are done so dirty so often.

Good Things Deserve Good Vibes! *Vibes Sent!

All very good/solid points.

The only "correction" I would put to that is that - the 'thing I am hung up on' is that the statements made are Lies, they are simply not true and provably so.

So I guess you are absolutely right in that when people defend and want to suck down the lies being fed to them like a holy scripture and relentlessly defend it, it disgusts me. It is the same behaviour that people use to justify CP and other things of that nature. Obtusely ignoring the point of the arguments being made while trying to drag the conversation with things that are considered outliers to the topic but are not related to the point itself.

I guess you can say that is an over analyzation.
I should have just said that Loading is a Troll and is Gaslighting the comments with his so called "opinions", cause obviously a lot of his "opinions" are in the $h|t that never happened category.

-----

I could have continued my idiocy from what is almost yesteryear at this point, but being a Man is about controlling your feelings to the highest degree and owning the mistakes that you have made. Learn, Improve, Keep Pushing. As a Man I constantly need to push myself to be refined as a person even if that is only done for me, after all everything that happens to me is my fault.

Like how we ended up here: I said some poorly put together things that generated a comment thread. I followed up on another person's comment and that opened the floor to you to make an arguable back-handed comment about my person. Was your reply an attack of sorts, sure. As it turns out you can make a well put together reply and it is top tier, at least I would say it is. The only issue that remains in my mind is how you came to post your first comment. You can say that it was just matching energy for energy, I will accept that. The thing that does you a disservice is your lack of supporting points, even if those points are to refute my own points. I would actually prefer that you refute points specifically, because they are the proof that Loading is a Liar and no one wants to address that specifically.

The kicker for all of this, if I convince anyone by using facts to see reason and become neutral in the arguments, I have done a service for the community. If I turn a person to my side to call me out when I do wrong but will support truth above everything else then that is a win for the community and those that do good for the community are doing good for me. You can straight hate my guts for no reason and that is perfectly fine, hell it would even say it is amazing in it's own right - as long as it is not a lie, we are good.

Well... depressed is accurate. But you got me right confused, a troll, highly autistic? Please explain how you came to that realm of conclusion?

Though you are half right in a way. Instead of foaming at the mouth though it can be said talking to people does drive a portion of my depression; I mean it is truly incredible that people consistently miss the point of statements as if it is the sole reason they exist. They just parrot things repeatedly even if those things are proven false, repeatedly. It is like interacting with an NPC. They say something really interesting or not so much and when asked more about it their programming fails. Then they get upset and just toss insult or try to label others as an ~ism of some sort so they do not have to be held to account or explain; much better than just becoming outright violent I guess?