Home
Latest update
Manga Directory
New Manga
Genres
4 koma
Action
Adult
Adventure
Artbook
Award winning
Comedy
Cooking
Doujinshi
Drama
Ecchi
Erotica
Fantasy
Gender Bender
Gore
Harem
Historical
Horror
Isekai
Josei
Loli
Manhua
Manhwa
Martial Arts
Mecha
Medical
Music
Mystery
One shot
Overpowered MC
Psychological
Reincarnation
Romance
School Life
Sci-fi
Seinen
Sexual violence
Shota
Shoujo
Shoujo Ai
Shounen
Shounen Ai
Slice of Life
Sports
Super power
Supernatural
Survival
Time Travel
Tragedy
Webtoon
Yaoi
Yuri
If there was no such thing as plot armour then most stories would just end in 1 to 2 or a dozen chapters.
You know he is not going to die, it is about HOW they get from point A to B and if that is interesting.
This comment is all kinds of wrong that pulls deep on the anger and disappointment inside of me. I am just going to stop here, do better.
+1 for the cup!
For me this is a more broad annoyance - my own parents would drive me insane with things like calling all vehicles a car [They had always had three when I was growing up and did not own an actual car from ~1995 to 2022 {I was born in 1989}]. To me it is like calling a Bison or Buffalo a Cow, or maybe a better extreme would be calling a goat a cow because it also makes milk. Yeah, that level of 'how does this person even breath' intellect.
Though it was mentioned that the other ones that make things that are equal to running a cut under warm-hot water overcharge to the extreme. So maybe (super*) would have been a better thing for me to write.
If anything was a downside it might have put my feels on high-alert!
It really is hard to find something that is GOOD, and just stays GOOD through and through all the way to the end. Especially so if your "tastes" fluctuate on the finer points like mine do.
Nostalgia truly is an amazing brain drug though. Loved Dragon Ball back in the day, just do not ask me to re-watch it (well maybe DB but not DBZ). That is actually kind of relevant with how slows some of theses things release! are we hyping them up too much in the end? Honestly I could say this gives AI a tiny hopeful outlook, cause if you could have it make those adjustments... IP falling into the hands of the unwanted or those that do not do things justice could be redone, especially in a still image graphical format. Fine lines though.
I do certainly agree it is fast especially in comparison but I personally do not get 20,50,100+ chapters in and continue to care about how good the first few are. It would have to have been an Epic or Masterpiece to warrant that kind of caring. just go ten or something chapters down the line and either 'drop it' or take a hit of nostalgia and never look back! ha-ha-ha!
Either you like this rendition or you do not. Read it because you like it or hate read or do not read at all. If you do not like it and can not forgive those points start the hunt for the next thing. Just do not do yourself the disservice of reading something you do not enjoy for the purpose of enjoyment.
There was no Pre or Post Hoc in my statements. You appear to have combined the two separate issue into one instance - once again that is the problem with your position. You have not done well enough to clarify what factors your have considered; at first I assumed your position applied up to the point that where after eliminating the first four ghouls and defeating the crowd of puppet/ghouls that was protecting her after she made clear her intentions to kill him. The before and after of her being struck down in the process of clearing that second group is the defining point in this situation.
Your points on this are not clear enough to have proper understanding of your position. Does your position of capture/unnecessary killing start when she was disarmed/knocked down and does it stop when she got back up and started attacking again?
(I will temporarily ignore all other points for this vital clarification)
the reason you argument is moot is as stated: that even though it is correct for the moment that the event occurred, the follow up on what happens when you do that for that particular individual in the particular instance has already been shown. The weakness (of your argument) is that you did not put enough emphasis that what you were stating only applies up to that point and not beyond. If your point of morality did included the actions that happened beyond that point, then you need to seriously reconsider it but I assume you were not including the actions after the fact.
The fact that you do not agree that killing a person with a disease that could wipe out the planet as a morally good thing shows how weak your moral stance is. Being moral is about doing what is right, it is not about doing what makes you personally feel good at your convenience. Not killing a person that you know for certain will wipeout the plant; I would love to see some reasoning for that.
Is there a major difference to the return home and travel versions... I am now wondering if there are floating islands... cause that can really become something.
I think you are spot on when you say subjective in this context. Though I do, after some thought, know what it is that you "do not understand". Like any decent, thinking person you likely have no idea how they came to such a flawed conclusion. Why they throw out insults when their "argument" is exceptionally weak.
The use of an IRL example in a Fantasy setting may have been the wrong move though. Not being able to shift ones mindset fully between the two might have been the crux of the issue. It excuses nothing, it just may help prevent things like this in the future - lol consider this last bit advice I wish I could give myself and have stick!
For this specific instance we already know the immediate result of such actions. The thing that makes this an issue in my mind is that sparing someone is generally a good thing (though that can be biased from the existing relationship if there is one). The issue at hand for this one has two MAJOR points with more that I likely did not even think of: The MC has no way to disarm/disable/subdue the girl in any meaningful fashion that would make ability a non threat, Secondly she is a self confessed/professed murder Whom has admitted to try to trap and kill him directly.
So to me the moral argument goes out the window with those elements. In a "normal" IRL example those extra factors do not exist, but in this story the do, so the argument was never a one to one comparison with IRL situations and became incorrect. It was more like super humans/mutants with untold variables. though I will say in an IRL example if the threat can/has been disarmed/subdued without danger - that is the point where it starts to become gray; too further dirty that point the gray is also dependant on what happens after you decide on an action, if you just took out a couple of seven year-olds - that is in a different realm of taking out known repeat offends that the 'System' will not properly contain and I known for retaliation.
Sometimes it is easy to have an answer, but most of the times it is not. I am not saying waste your breath but maybe a touch more with a specific detail, may take you a long way?