agree to disagree

how are you supposed to keep room in an analogy for something you don't understand? the whole point of an analogy is to compare it to something else to make it make sense, you cant make sense of something that you don't have any knowledge of?

yea thats exactly my point, he cant make an analogy for something he doesnt understand. he cant leave room to make additions later for a power he cant comprehend

i mean he doesnt know how level 14/15 works so ofc he cant make an analogy that includes them or an anology that has room for them to be added after. if he knew what made 14/15 so special it would be a completely different story

how did he swap with his sword? i dont think we've seen a power he has that can do that but theres a high chance i forgot

pretty sure we already got the voices face reveal back during their last conversation

the law of equivalent exchange

why are the elders of a strong family plotting a way to get more power even if it means going against the random child of the current patriarch? idk thats just how every plot goes

its like a game of risk, you ally with the other weaker force to take on the stronger force until everything is rebalanced, then someone else gets stronger and backstabs/gets backstabbed due to the power difference and repeat. theo is ultimately gonna fight the elders i think (not spoilers i dont read the LN) and ofc troivan is an enemy.

they were watching the whole time and kaydens gonna actually give him props for the damage he did right right... tell me he gets acknowledged...

welcome back everyone!

swordplay has nothing to do with squatting a 400lbs, i mean don't get me wrong obvi he's building muscle from sword training but the muscle groups are different for the 2

i'm not the only one wierded out by some of these comments right? i mean like at the end of the day its fictional characters and im no better when it comes to some of these artists and characters, but when a character is drawn lewd vs just existed its odd... not to mention that these are children as are most characters we met. its one thing to point out "best girl" and whatnot and ship around but screenshotting a (fictional) childs chest? yall gotta have some basic class fr

ngl i didnt understand a single fuckng thing you said

im cool with spoilers as it relates to this connection if you can share?

lmao i got blocked so i cant even pull out actual big words to argue with this bitch

you fucking CURSED ME

again, you go straight to insulting even though you're upset the other comment was "degrading women" yet here you are degrading me for calling out your hypocrisy.

its very obviously about sinclair specifically. its a comment under a post that is clearly referencing sincliars stupidity. also morality of the comment aside, its really funny how you think you have some moral high ground calling out the comment of "women" when your assuming the commentors gender and instantly turn to insulting the commentor calling them a "sexist loser incel" while then asking them to "now the proper plurality to use!". not only are you standing on false moral high ground but also its really ironic you ask them be mindful of proper grammer when you mixed up "now and know"
https://i.postimg.cc/GptmTCb7/i.jpg
Oh and here's a screenshot so you cant go back and edit or delete your comments. forever engraved to the internet of your stupidity

tbf its a singular character being referenced so woman would be correct?