this is it fr

did she actually wear it proudly tho? I feel like that could have been explored better but yeah

also in the end isn't it a tool to employ disloyalty to the various military services from then on anyways

He def revives after this, it can't end here, it literally cannot

ultimate ahh tragedies are the worst myan

and she's one of the more humane characters in the manwha too, a wise man type mf if you will

lmfao we are screwed

None of this goes again the idea that it's special properties of the gun, it's completely plausible in this piece of fiction they've decided a star silver gun can enchant bullets or smshi

I'm more concerned about how they will portray the vampires taking damage
in-game it's a percentage damage that is doubled/haved/ignored but i the manwha what will happen? is the vampire lord just intangible unless hit with silver, and he doesn't heal wounds from star silver?

I didnt notice the thing about the guns instead of the bullets, but magic is magic so it don't matter ig

also what are we on, it was obviously a gag, and realistically lukas did not actually intend to murder the rude denizen

lmfao

I was following until that last part. Every character matters, I'd say a good mc but a horrible cast is probably better than a good cast with a horrible mc, but mc isn't even all bad enough to justify saying he's horrible

it's more like an average mc and a good cast

ad in the first place pick me up wasn't some half ahh power fantasy? that feels like it'd have the worst type of mc, no?

idk, I've literally never had issues with this art

and the side characters are all written pretty nicely in this, when from what I saw in pick me up, practically every other character (there were alot of extras) were one note, or washboards

preference thing

tomska mgoat

meh

Wait, I thought the gargoyle had magic res on its outside and phys res on its inside? huh?

this some hidden tech

Preach (gun safety!)

Uh, the idea is that neither side should be allowed to claim moral authority, it's what I was going for when I went "TP didn't try to force the language so you shouldn't have been so resistant"

but if we're trying for some preemptive, guerilla tactics here
some next level ultra overkill of the subject, there is still nothing I can say

With customised pronouns you're forcing irrelevancy upon a subject that decreases the efficiency of conversation and communication

it's not like it's workable through, but you're putting extra effort into making interactions more tedious, and for what?
it's impossible to identify to a gender that you've made up, since the gender you've made up or the pronouns you use is personalizzed to you
if there are other groups that can relate then sure, if this is a matter of looking for a particular group that shares your interests that is SOMEHOW completely unrelated to the experiences of people that identify as a man or woman, go for it

but aside from that it's a needlessly long extra mile to take

I said gender is the start, not the end all be all. I'm not getting friends based on their gender, I explained to you that one of the important qualities in regards to social interaction is the idea of relating to their experiences, because alot of feelings cannot or really should not (socially), or even are preferred not to be spoken with words.

In which case, these specific groups are essential. And one of the most basic of these groups is gender. You don't ask a pianist how they manage their oxygen tanks, do you? Conversations and interactions are often very very greatly alleviated by these relations, just because it's not the epitome of relation doesn't mean it doesn't help a fuckton.
---
"You don't need to be worrying about befriending your doctor or mechanic" I'm using them as easily explainable groups where their differences are so well defined that you understand, when scaled down to regular interpersonal relationships, there is absurdity in the idea that the relations groups entertain is irrelevant. I don't talk enough where i can think of a realistic example off the top of my head that doesn't sound entirely weird,

something like talking to someone who only plays shooter games 8/10 times is going to differ from someone who only plays pokemon and animal crossing. Not in the literal sense of talking, but in the subjects and presumptions applicable to their character.
---
Why would I get mad at gender neutral terms? I'm arguing that the very notion of gender is a group, I'd go one step further and say alienating yourself from a given gender by adhering to the next gender is just saying you're more easily relating to a certain group's gender roles, the idea that your relations and experiences can be unrelated to either gender to me simply doesn't make sense. Rather simply "identifying" (being in relation to) certain gender roles and experiences is all that conversation asks for.
---
Using a masculine pronoun because they're intimidating is a reasonable response to someone breaking into your room, it's not "stupid" you naturally assume that because your experiences and familiarity with the male gender exuberates the characteristics faced by you here. It's not "women can't steal" or "I think everything is masculine"

it's "I need to have an automatic assumption, and alot of the times I see men that are srtong, bulky, and working out. Alot of the guys I've seen also happen to be very bold, and similarly I've seen alot of male delinquents", your first thought is going to be that it's a guy. Also, I'm saying gender is for interpersonal relationships, but you're not relating to a criminal, hence why it's gender is irrelevant here and why gender neutral terms are prevalent. If you don't know someone's "gender", but they look like a woman, it's proper to assume they're a woman.

I mean
the issue is kind of
there's nothing else for me to defend? like I can point out holes in their arguments, but I'm in favour of the idea of their being an inherent uselessness attached to custom pronouns

and even though I call it irrational, it is a factual statement that if permitted, a larger population of people likeminded with TP may change the norms regarding the MK community, in which case I can say I would not prefer

and then ontop of that I can say exactly why I wouldn't prefer it exactly

Maybe i just wanted a moral highground against peers, in the first place their approach regarding the comments was the only thing to argue against really
It's not like I didn't speak against TP but he's barely written enough in comparison to the long ahh sh user15 something sent n stuff, almost pales in comparison

did I respond to this, it feels like I did

but yeah by vocal maiority (practically majority afaik) I meant the general notiong and mental imagery regarding the trans community

Imma be honest with you bro

I see long ass arguments like these and I genuinely just feel left out sometimes
I mean it's a comment and I'm anonymous, so i can necropost, but there's some sort of emptiness

like you ever think of aretort to an argument in the shower? it's like that whenever I see this, except I can actually leave a reply with that retort
I'm gonna forget all about it by the time I'm at the next chapter anyways