I don't get why MC planned to burn the scroll even for a short bit. What was the point of finding the scroll just to destroy it?

Well it's not like they couldn't earn money from adventuring, they would just need to cut out the adventuring guild who would enslave them for failing. This all might be a bit of a mistranslation though. It just doesn't fit with the rest of the comic.

That's still such a massive difference in speed that it is hard to express. Like over a quintilian or whatever difference in speed.

MC can cross the cosmos many light-years across and not take eons to get there but takes weeks to cross a planet. I don't get it. Some kind of warp mode?

Also forgot to comment about calling the planet a "star" in last chapter. I've seen this particular translation or whatever problem in another comic

So much for keeping a low profile. Crippled yourself for it as well.

Isn't that the minion of the evil secret guild leader MC recently confronted?

https://i.postimg.cc/25JgxYzN/i.png
This must be a mistranslation but I can't figure out what is meant.. My best guess from context is died, burned up, or exploded with the named monster? Since the translation is "oxidized", burned up is my best guess, though it doesn't make sense why they would think that.

If every failure resulted in enslavement then the adventuring system in general would crumble since the risk would be too high.

Not "my logic", but logic in general. Fantasy species have nothing to do with this topic

What is the reference?

Why drop your weapon and shield?

I don't see why that last burst step would have been necessary if not for Silve. If MC could use air magic to throw the enemy way up in the air, the same could be done to throw the enemy to MC to attack while eh was still unconscious.

Or summon the ice spike right under and drop a big object above to drive it through using magic.

What about it?

Please find a good English class.to attend before continuing this conversation.

Right, glad you see it my way.

So struggling with English and basic logic. That is very sad.

It's a logic issue. I can't be proven wrong about the future when I have made no claims about the future. Just like saying it's 100% impossible to be a widow who has never married or a very tall short person or whatever else.

It would be impossible for a new chapter to "prove me wrong" since I am only stating what has been provided by author up till this point.

"1. MC is not biologically malei
Is not true cause you don't know that, only the author do and that's why I'm talking about what's the author intents are with the artist."

What we know is MC is a tree, it is in the title. And trees don't have sex. Your conjecture based on art is just that, conjecture. You don't know anything more than I do. Also aside from it being pure conjecture, it is also irrelevant.

"2. MC has not identified as any gender. "master appearances is so handsome""

Sorry, I thought you natively spoke English. See if a person identifies as a gender, those words have to come from the person. Someone who identifies as female for example, it doesn't matter how masculine other people around them find them, it matters what they think. If MC says "I am male" or "I am female", then MC would be choosing a gender identity. Till something like that happens, MC has not identified as a gender.

Your conjecture is meaningless.

1. MC is not biologically male, even if in the form of a male. You can't say "oh because MC was in the form of a male then MC identifies as a male" It could just be a convenient form to take without MC giving it any thought at all.
2. MC has not identified as any gender.

None of what you said even touches either of these iron clade points that MC has no gender. What you did do is show me that you weren't giving any thought to what you were replying to by saying "You really wants mc to be female." Amazing show of ignorance/stupidity by saying that.

Also again gender or lack of gender is completely irrelevant to the story, why do you need MC to be thought of as "male" so badly?