Well, I didn't really answer that because I am honestly tired of going in circles. I gave you everything you need to know, and you deflected quite a few of the things that I have said over and over again. Yet, you go and cry over the smallest things and act like I am ignoring you when I have yet to put off a single statement of yours. To be honest, none of your statements even have good points. We still follow laws from 200+ years ago, so why are you surprised that we follow a definition from 35 years ago? That is actually quite young for the legal world, so it just shows your ignorance in this realm. Talking to you doesn't feel too dissimilar from trudging through waist-high slough.
I really and truly am sorry to leave you because I know that without me you have nobody to talk to, but you’ve worn me out. If you wanted to win the argument out of endurance, then congrats! You won. Go give yourself a trophy or something. And if you wanted to win it out of me 'rage quitting' then... ARGHHHH! AM MADDENED! TEENSY 2 IQ CHILD ON THE INTERNET GOT ME FUMIN! If you were hoping for me to say that I was wrong, then I admit: I lied about everything. I created that artificial article and fake government site just so that I could be the victor of this argument. But you caught me! The whole thing is fake and you were always correct. I would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn't for you meddling kid!

Yippeee! you asked!(not really but mocking is basically asking >:D) now I finally have someone I can vent to about this :DDD. I’ve been trying to explain things between emergencies, but for now I got all the time in the world :>
First off: this is not a nuclear reactor but a bio-reactor. what i am about to tell you is a gross, stubborn, everyday reality of running a modified SHIME-style gut simulator. The biology is doing what it’s supposed to do, but it’s doing it to our equipment. Because we’re running a dense intestinal fermentation environment, we’re constantly generating organic acids and biofilm. And that biofilm is not some tiny “eh, wipe it off” thing, it builds up fast, it clings to everything, and I have to clean it off with a tank algae scrubber that i then have to sterilize after each cleaning. And there are a lot of seals. I think the bacteria like the taste of silicone. The silicone seals keep getting eaten through. After about a week, they do not have any visual signs of wearing out, but they become the weakest point in the setup. When we hit that late-night stretch when everyone is sleeping, and while I said around midnight to 3 AM that depends on whether I cleaned it before leaving for the day, once the sensors are blocked and reactor doesn’t drain surplus like it’s supposed to because it cannot be manned, the pressure and volume creep up, fermentation keeps going, and eventually, a seal just gives and pressure makes it explode, And the sensors… oh my goodness, the sensors. The biofilm coats them in a pale, clinging sludge and throws the readings off, and since there are 16 per tank it can take forever to finish cleaning. The system can be sitting there acting like everything is fine while the tank is at “about to ruin my life” levels. That’s why I’ve been manually scrubbing them. If I don’t, the system is essentially blind. it’s either I clean them or we roll the dice on another overflow.
Please scroll down to Part 2 which i sent first, that’s where I explain the software/automation failures and why I’m completely swamped.

Now, the part that’s making my normal life ten times worse: the computer program that manages the draining and safeguards is having major issues and so i am having to patch the software. The whole point of automation is to catch problems before they become disasters, but right now it’s unreliable. Instead of draining on schedule, it just doesn’t. mainly because the sensor lies to it, and it thinks it did because the film on them makes it detect liquid flow EVEN THOUGH FLOW IS SITTING STILL and it blocks it from feeling pressure. I’m stuck babysitting something that should be automatic while trying to keep the hardware from getting eaten alive. When an overflow happens, which can be literally ANY MOMENT AT ALL, it’s not a quick cleanup. It’s hours of containing the mess, disassembling fittings, scraping biofilm off ports, swapping seals, reassembling, leak checking, and trying to figure out what the control system did (or didn’t) do this time, I then need to go take a shower. On top of that, I still have to keep the testing schedule moving. I’m juggling daily pH/temp checks, sampling, diet changeovers, and extra cleanup in case it decided to randomly explode during the middle of the night and since I sleep at the assigned dorm when everyone else just goes home it is always me who wakes up in the morning and has to clean the mess >:( until we get the automation stable and use seal materials that can actually survive this very acidic environment, my life will continue to be a living hell, these messes are going to keep happening and I will very much so continue to lack time :DDD and the annoying flow blocked alarm keeps chirping every little bit despite the flow very much so being active but I cannot turn it off because it is active as long as the system is, thankfully now I have time as I am just monitoring the data to see if I am close to patching this and waiting for the psm to finally finish synthesizing new samples for testing which can easily take an hour or two so I was finally able to write things out :>

Ah, so the loneliness has reached the point where even a few argument-free days are too much to bear! Poor little soul who i only now realize has only been seeking a friend this entire time. Give me a moment—my brain is juggling flaming office problems—and I’ll be back to spar and play in no time :D One of the reactors keeps overflowing between 12:00 am and 3:00 am when it cannot be drained, and one of the software programs we’re testing keeps frying the logic it runs on. Since both issues fall under my jurisdiction, I have to repair them on top of my already very busy schedule, which has left me with barely any time to sleep, so i have found myself with little to no time to argue with you.

Oh yeah, and just in case you fuss about real-world use once more, here is a link to TIME Magazine calling the jury 'the court': time.com/archive/6798777/the-press-star-dimmed/ :D

The headline says 'JURY FINDS THE STAR GUILTY,' and the very next paragraph says the publisher called the jury's decision 'THE COURT'S VERDICT.' I’ve given you the U.S. Government, Black’s Law Dictionary, and now one of the most famous magazines in history. You aren't arguing with me anymore; you’re arguing with reality. It’s pathetic. I'm done providing links for a grown man who can't use a search engine. Enjoy being the only person on earth who doesn't understand what a collective noun is. 👋

It is genuinely precious that you think calling me a 'MORON' in all caps affects me. I told you—I don’t feel anger. I just feel pity.

You’re throwing a tantrum because you don’t know how to use a search bar. You’re acting like navigating a website is as hard as 'Advanced Modern Algebra.' It’s not. It’s a government glossary. The fact that you think you need to check 2,500 pages one-by-one instead of just typing a word into a search bar proves you are exactly the 'smooth-brain' you claim to hate.

You want the link and the 'text' since you're too lazy to find it? Here is your 'spoon-feed' for the day: uscourts.gov/glossary

From the site itself:

Verdict: 'The decision of a trial jury or a judge that determines the guilt or innocence of a criminal defendant...' Court: 'Government entity authorized to resolve legal disputes.'

Notice how a Verdict is the decision of the Jury, but it is officially rendered and recorded as the act of the Court. This is why every news station and legal document says 'The Court found him guilty.' It’s a collective noun. I’m sorry that basic English and legal terminology are as difficult for you as 'Advanced Algebra,' but that’s a failure of your education, not my 'lies.'

I’m done with your imaginary math. 2+2=4, and You + A Search Bar = A total meltdown. Keep screaming 'LIAR' at the screen if it makes you feel better about being outclassed by a 'Baboon' who knows how to use a mouse.

This is my last response. You’ve been great entertainment, but even the circus gets boring after a while. Enjoy the last word—I know you’re desperate for it. Bye, 'lil buddy.' 👋

Once again, I’ll repeat my source since you might not have fully understood it the first time: 'uscourts.gov'. Did you see that? No? I SHALL SAY IT AGAIN: uscourts.gov. IT IS A SITE! GO TO IT! GO LOOK AT THE MEDIA! GO DO SOME SEARCHES!

Stop being a no-life for one single second in your miserable existence and DO. YOUR. OWN. RESEARCH!!! I'm not your search engine, and I'm certainly not your mother. If you can't navigate a .gov website, you have no business pretending you understand the law.

P.S. This has been genuinely hilarious. I physically cannot feel anger, so watching you blow a gasket over a URL has been top-tier entertainment. Thanks for the laughs, 'lil buddy'—it’s been fun watching you lose your mind! :D

It takes you 'hours' to find a procedural description on a federal website? Thank you for finally admitting you’re technologically illiterate along with being legally illiterate. It took me thirty seconds.

Since you’re clearly struggling with your 'useless spheres,' let me help you: The phrase is a standard procedural description found in Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and educational resources on uscourts.gov regarding the 'Trial' process. If you had the IQ of a lukewarm bowl of soup, you’d realize that 'The Court's verdict' is used because the Court (the institution) renders the final judgment based on the jury's finding.

But here, since you’re begging like a lost dog, here is your 'spoon-fed' reality check: Go to the Glossary of Legal Terms on uscourts.gov. Look at the definition of Verdict: 'The decision of a trial jury or a judge that determines the guilt or innocence of a criminal defendant...' Now, look at how every single federal press release is titled. 'Court finds...' or 'Court sentences...' even when a jury was involved. Why? Because—and try to keep up—'The Court' is the collective entity.

You are throwing a world-class temper tantrum because you don't understand how metonyms work. You’re literally crying for a 'case file' for a common English language convention. It’s like demanding a 'case file' to prove that people call a 'car' a 'ride.'

I’m done being your IT support and your English tutor. You’ve officially reached the limit of my patience for the 'technologically challenged.' Go find a grandson to teach you how to use a search engine, 'lil buddy.' We’re done. 👋

Are you actually this helpless? I gave you the source (uscourts.gov) and the gold standard of legal definitions (Black’s Law Dictionary), yet you’re still sitting there with your mouth open waiting for me to spoon-feed you a link?

How pathetically worthless are those useless spheres attached to your face if you can't even type 'uscourts.gov' into a search bar? I’m not your secretary, 'lil buddy.' If you’re too lazy or too incompetent to verify a government source yourself, that’s a 'you' problem.

You keep crying about 'evidence,' but when I give you the U.S. Federal Court's own terminology, you start screaming about 'case files.' It’s a general procedural description—it applies to every jury trial in the country. But I guess a 'human glossary' like you can't grasp a concept unless it’s in a pop-up book.

And stop obsessing over my cousin. It’s getting creepy. I know you’re desperate for a mentor since you clearly didn't get an education, but mocking mine will not get you any closer to getting your own. Either address the fact that the U.S. Government uses 'The Court' to refer to a jury's verdict, or admit you’re just a loud-mouthed fraud who’s scared of a URL.

Which is it? Are you going to go use your 'two little eyes' to read the law, or are you going to keep throwing a tantrum because I won't do your homework for you?

It’s hilarious how you’re screaming for 'evidence' like a toddler who can’t find his shoes. You want an excerpt? Here’s one from the U.S. Courts official website (uscourts.gov):

'The court’s verdict was read aloud...' Wait, who decided that verdict? The Jury. How about Black’s Law Dictionary? It defines 'The Court' not just as a person, but as 'The person or body of persons officially assembled under authority of law at the appropriate time and place for the administration of justice.'

Notice the word 'Body of persons', 'lil buddy'? That includes the Jury. In legal writing, 'The Court' is a collective noun for the entire judicial proceeding. But I guess your 'precious ChatGPT' didn't explain Collective Nouns to you.

And for the record:

Revenge Killing vs. Murder: I never said it wasn't a killing; I said it lacks the Mens Rea for a murder conviction under the Model Penal Code § 210.3 due to Extreme Emotional Disturbance. You’d know that if you could read something longer than a cereal box, if you really want more reference than that GO USE YOUR SEARCH ENGINE! literally Just search for ‘what does a court’s verdict mean’.

Grammar vs. Spell Checker: You're still crying about this? It’s like watching a man drown in a puddle.

The 'Thus' Mistake: You still haven't explained why you think 'thus' means 'this.' I guess Justice Scalia's 'text' only applies when it isn't making you look like a clown.

You keep calling me a 'baboon,' but you’re the one performing for me. You are so desperate for my attention that you’re demanding I 'scour' your messages. Why would I? I already pointed out three of your failures in my last post, and you were too scared to even address them and yet i have confronted everything you have said head on and do not hide like a crybaby under the covers like you do under grammar.

You’re not even discussing things with me anymore; you’re just yelling about non-existent problems so that you can hide your failures. Go find a dictionary that explains what 'Collective Noun' means, then come back when you’ve finished your homework. Or just keep 'LOL-ing' to hide the fact that you’re outmatched. Which one is it? Seriously, just stop bothering me and go read this stuff yourself for once, must i do all your thinking for you?

It’s adorable that you had to go running to an AI to find a definition because you can't form an original thought. Yes, they have different definitions—everyone knows that. My point, which you are still too 'smooth-brained' to grasp, is that they are used interchangeably in context.
If you actually knew anything about Justice Scalia, you’d know he cared about contextual meaning. When a news report says 'The Court found him guilty,' do you call the news station crying because a Jury actually delivered the verdict? No, because you’d look like a lunatic. Yet here you are, doing exactly that.
You are obsessed with dictionary entries because you are deathly afraid of the actual law.
You’re hiding behind a ChatGPT definition of 'Court' because you know that if we actually talk about the substance of the case, you’re finished. You’re like a guy arguing about the font on a 'No Trespassing' sign while he’s standing in a house that’s on fire.
Keep Googling definitions, 'lil buddy.' It’s a great way to avoid admitting you’ve lost the actual debate. If you ever find the courage to talk about Legal Justification, let me know. Until then, enjoy your participation trophy from ChatGPT. I’m so tired and done wasting my time on a human glossary, yet here you are, stretching the conversation out so much in hopes of gaining some kind of advantage, chasing after tiny details as if anyone actually cares. i know for certain that your parents do not just like everything else that you do :> so since you no longer have any actual things to say can i go now? or do you yet again have more grammar lessons for me? i just had a truly grand thought, what if i pulled out an uno reverse?

For someone who calls people 'semi-literate,' you don’t even know the difference between 'this' and 'thus.' You’re trying so hard to sound smart that you’re tripping over basic four-letter words.

You quoted Justice Scalia saying 'the text is the law,' yet you can’t even master the 'text' of a 3rd-grade contraction. Where are your apostrophes, 'lil buddy'? Is the 'text' only important when you aren't the one typing it?

'Since when does people refers...'? Seriously? It’s 'do people refer.' If you’re going to be a grammar Nazi, at least pass an elementary English quiz first. It’s physically painful to watch you struggle this much with basic subject-verb agreement while calling others 'low IQ.

When I make errors, it’s by choice to appear like an easy target; when I notice you make errors, it’s clear you lack the skill to avoid them :>

If I really wanted, I could go and scour through every single one of your messages and find every flaw, just as you’ve done with mine, but that feels like a massive waste of my oh-so-precious time that you are wasting.

The thing is, I’m not actually wrong. In legal practice and common reporting, 'The Court' is frequently used interchangeably with the final decision made by the judge and jury together—phrases like 'The Court has reached a verdict' are used every single day.

But I see how much you’re struggling with this. Since you’re so desperate for a win that you’ve spent 48 hours crying over a synonym, I was willing to step down to your level and 'admit' it just to comfort you. :>

It’s clear you have abandoned all subjects other than grammar because those topics actually require a brain. You just want me to say a magic word so you can stop feeling like a loser. If you want to keep playing 'Dictionary' go for it, but it just proves you don't have the capacity for a real adult conversation. Are we done with your vocabulary lesson now, or do you have more nouns you feel like you want to explain?

Tell you what, since you’re so desperate for a win: I’ll absolutely admit I used a shorthand term you didn’t like, as long as you admit you lack the basic comprehension needed to understand what it meant in the first place :D

It’s pretty clear now that you’re just a broken record. I’ve given you the Model Penal Code, the science of trauma, and actual legal doctrines, and all you can do is cry about the difference between 'spell-checker' and 'grammar-checker' for ten hours.

You’re not 'teaching' me; you’re deflecting. You’re so terrified of a real debate that you’ve turned into a human dictionary because it’s the only place you aren't outclassed. It’s been fun watching you spiral and 'LOL' your way through a mental breakdown, but honestly? It’s getting boring watching a grown man have a tantrum over synonyms.

I came here for a conversation about law and morality; you came here to be a middle-school hall monitor. Since you’re clearly incapable of moving past the 'basic' level of a dictionary, I’m done spoon-feeding you. I’ll leave you to your grammar books and your 'room temperature' IQ—I’ve got better things to do than argue with someone who is scared of a statute.

Enjoy having the last word; I know you need it to feel like you matter. See ya, 'lil buddy.' 👋

Are you still crying for a 'confession' over a synonym? This is getting pathetic. I already explained to you that 'The Court' is standard shorthand for the legal outcome of a case. If you're too dense to understand how language works in the real world, that’s a 'you' problem, not a 'me' problem.

I’m not going to 'admit I’m wrong' for using a common term just because you’re desperate for a participation trophy. You’re acting like a child holding his breath until his face turns blue because he didn't like the word I used.

Notice the pattern here:

I bring up Irresistible Impulse. (You ignore it).

I bring up the Model Penal Code. (You ignore it).

I bring up 70 years of torture. (You ignore it).

You scream 'BUT THE DICTIONARY SAYS JURY!!' for three hours.

You aren't 'teaching' me anything; you’re stalling. You are terrified to move on to the actual legal doctrines because you know you’re outclassed. You’re hiding behind a dictionary because it’s the only place you feel safe.

So, I’ll make you a deal, 'lil buddy.' I’ll use the word Jury from now on if it helps your blood pressure, but only if you actually address the Doctrine of Competing Harms. Or are you going to spend another three days crying about the difference between 'lawyer' and 'attorney' next?

The fact that you need me to 'admit' something before you can even talk about the law proves you have zero confidence in your own argument. Talk about the Model Penal Code or admit you’re just a human spell-checker with no actual point to make.

It’s honestly hilarious how you keep screaming 'Dunning-Kruger' when you’re the literal poster child for it. You’ve spent the last three hours acting like you’re the Supreme Court Justice because you know the difference between 'Court' and 'Jury.' Wow, gold star for you! You can read a dictionary!

But notice how you still haven't touched the Model Penal Code? Notice how you’re still ignoring the Irresistible Impulse doctrine? You’re so obsessed with the 'basic and rudimentary' stuff because you’re terrified of the actual substance. You’re like a kid who thinks he’s an engineer because he can spell the word 'bridge,' even though he has no idea how to build one.

If you’re so smart, stop crying about my 'shorthand' and explain why a victim of 70 years of torture wouldn’t be granted a Necessity defense or Diminished Capacity. Oh, wait—you can’t. Because your 'expertise' ends at the letter J in the dictionary.

You’re literally throwing a tantrum over a synonym because you’re losing the actual debate. It’s not 'delusional' to use common legal shorthand; it’s delusional to think that wining a grammar battle means you won a legal argument about mens rea.

Keep 'LOL-ing' though. It really helps hide the fact that you’re out of your depth. Are you going to talk about the Doctrine of Competing Harms now, or do you need to spend another three hours Googling the definition of 'Doctrine' first?

Are you still on the dictionary thing? Seriously? It’s been like three rounds and you're still stuck on 'Court vs. Jury.' You’re acting like you’ve discovered fire because you found a Google definition, while completely ignoring the fact that in everyday legal talk and even in news headlines 'The Court' is used to describe the entire outcome of a case.

But I get it. You HAVE to stay on that one word. Because if you actually move on to the Model Penal Code or Temporary Insanity statutes, you’re going to get embarrassed again. You’re terrified of actually talking about the law, so you’re hiding behind a dictionary.

Wow! I’m so glad you’re having fun! Must be because, unlike your parents when you were younger, someone didn’t run for the hills the moment you started talking, so glad that i could be the father that you never had.

You’re like a toddler who found a shiny rock and thinks it’s a diamond. 'I found a definition! I’m smart now!' No, buddy. You’re still just a guy who thinks victims should have 'fair trials' for their slave traders. Every time you scream 'low IQ,' you’re just projecting in the hopes that maybe for once you can prove to yourself that maybe you do have an IQ above room temperature.

So, are you going to keep being a human dictionary, or are you going to actually address the Irresistible Impulse doctrine I brought up? Or does that require too much 'high IQ' reading for you?

Look, you can call me an idiot all you want, but at this point, it’s just sad. I mentioned my cousin not to 'gain an edge,' but because I’m getting my info from an actual lawyer while you're just making stuff up as you go. I was hoping if you knew where I was getting the laws from, you’d actually do five minutes of research before opening your mouth. Clearly, I expected too much.

And yeah, I act stupid intentionally. Common sense says you never show all your cards at once, and it’s been working great, you’ve spent this whole time underestimating me while I’m the only one here citing actual legal doctrine.

The point isn't 'fear me because of my cousin.' The point is: Go read a book. Whether you believe he exists or not is irrelevant; the laws are real, the medical science is real, and the materials are right there for you to read. But instead of educating yourself, you’re just spouting nonsense and trying to turn every sentence into a jab.

Honestly, even if you were the son of a world leader, I couldn't care less. It clearly wouldn't have done anything for your ability to hold a real conversation. It’s like I have to break down every little concept and spoon-feed it to you like a toddler just for you to still miss the point. Are you actually going to look at the statutes I gave you, or are you just going to quote a disfigured version of this and call me a name again?

I was actually talking about the jury when I said that, but what can you expect from someone who entirely lacks common sense? Should I also refer to humans as holobionts instead? Around 30% of my cells are non-human microbes, yet I’m still addressed as a single “person.” The word “person” is just a functional shorthand for a complex ecosystem, which only reinforces my point about how dull you are to talk to, you bring nothing new and make me expound upon every word I say. (<---see that? a use of common sense is used to understand what i meant even though i did not say these words and wrote them) If you claim they haven’t been proven guilty, then neither has she, because as the story says, many murders happen inside the gates without charges ever being filed, and the only witness was her friend, so the case was effectively closed before it began by your own reasoning. Back then, I wasn’t nearly as serious, hoping instead for lighthearted banter about whether she would be found guilty. I used some terms lightly or even intentionally misused them (if you have read any of my other comments you will see me entirely lacking grammar), because it’s often more fun to seem uneducated as people are more likely to go after an easy target afterall. I wouldn’t have brought my cousin into this at all, but you kept calling real laws “made up nonsense,” which felt like hearing someone say the Earth is flat, so of course I explained exactly where I learned these things and who taught me all of it.

Maybe it’s time I go on the offensive instead of letting someone without a brain take the lead :D I’m really not a fan of pursuing a person's flaws, though, and I feel it would leave me even more bored than explaining myself to somebody who cannot even comprehend intent is currently leaving me, are you having fun just pointlessly screaming at somebody on the internet and calling them names? at least you are not swearing at me, if that were so i would have left a long time ago