I’ve discussed each of these subjects in depth, so if you didn’t read them, that’s not on me. I’ve never backpedaled—only explained the value of life and pointed out that Hitler is still 17 million in debt. Just as a bank doesn’t owe you for repaying your loan, you don’t owe him anything. You call me stupid yet can’t read, and if turning off some random boring 10-hour looping video you found is running away then excuse me whilst I 'run away'. Murder is murder, but justice isn’t murder, frying a killer in the electric chair doesn’t suddenly make you a murderer. My cousin is indeed a lawyer, wealthy enough to own mansions across the USA and other countries, to the point where it’s cheaper for him to move abroad during tax season than stay here, ESPECIALLY AFTER WINNING A CASE, last time he left he did not leave the USA as he went to Puerto Rico since it was not so dire of a time and their taxes are more lenient.
While having a lawyer cousin doesn’t always mean you learn from them, that is different for me as-
-I DO happen to interact with him often
-the cousin DOES happen teaches or discusses law with me, and it is very fun
-I actually understand the subject well because WE HAVE BEEN DOING THIS FOR YEARS! since his son who is now balding and married was only a teen if I my memory serves me correctly.
And last but not least, GOOD JOB! YA ASKED CHAT GPT AND HE GAVE YOU SOME GOOD ANSWERS! now how hard was that? Now, if you'll excuse me, I'll slip out the door and make my getaway from the proverbial scene and the not so proverbial boredom that being associated with you brings so goodbye!

You know that the lessons from your parents also come naturally, right? By naturally, I don’t mean something you’re born with. I can’t believe I had to explain one of the most basic aspects of society to you. A little common sense could go a long way. I also said the conversation would end if it stayed boring and you didn’t do any research, but somehow you even lost common sense. So goodbye, and I hope that you have a pleasant life.

That’s not what I’m saying at all. I mean I need to understand this topic before talking to him, otherwise he’ll be bored like I’m bored talking to you. You wouldn’t start chatting with a surgeon about how to perform surgery and act like you’re the best surgeon in the world, because even your most impressive thoughts would seem like child’s play to them—boring, in other words. I’m not making excuses, just explaining why someone who knows nothing about this subject comes across as dull. Basically, it’s me saying “go study or go away” because you’re completely wrong and uninformed. It’s like listening to a twelve-year-old who thinks they’ve mastered algebra after figuring out that in 2(x - 4) = 10, x = 9, and then when you offer harder problems to teach them more, they call you a drunken baboon making up math. Makes sense? Do some research before we continue, BECAUSE THIS CONVERSATION IS AS BORING AS WATCHING PAINT DRY—you’re not creative, repetitive, refuse to learn, and dismiss actual laws as mere nonsense and I quite frankly have grown tired of watching a pug ram it's head into the fence

Why am I wasting so much time talking to what feels like a broken record with the sentience of a gourd? After this, I’ll give one more question before ending this discussion out of sheer boredom with the lack of creativity and initiative to do any real research. Since you clearly won’t find them yourself, I’ll provide them: look up “The Battered Woman Syndrome” expert testimony standards (set by Dr. Lenore Walker). It’s not just a feeling—70 years of torture can break a mind. Denying that is like arguing a car could keep running after being driven into a wall for 70 years straight. Also, stop with all the victim blaming. For your journal, as requested, read the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) sections on Dissociative Identity Disorder and CPTSD. For the so-called “low IQ baboons who wrote these things,” learn about the M’Naghten Rule, the Durham Rule, and the Model Penal Code. If these concepts are unclear, consult ChatGPT for simpler explanations, but return with actual facts—otherwise, as stated, the next question will be the last.

It might seem odd that I know all this, and you’d be right, but that knowledge comes naturally when your cousin is a world-renowned lawyer; otherwise, I wouldn’t even measure up to the lowest standard in his eyes. For a similar reason, you bore me—you know so little about what you’re arguing that I find myself yawning as I read your messy, repetitive speech. So either make things interesting or leave me alone, as I have far better things to do than respond to you.

just a note that a person in court deemed insane is not actually insane
Temporary Insanity: This is a claim that the defendant was insane only at the moment of the crime, often triggered by extreme trauma or the person being in a "heat of passion" which after 70 years of hate and agony i would not be surprised if that state lasted an entire year on her, you can pretend to be smart all you wish but if you never do any research then you are but a fool parading around with only the guise of intelligence about them, and if you are going to waste my time then please keep this entertaining, it is the least you can do afterall :/ you know what would actually be interesting ? ROLEPLAYING A COURT CASE!

Stupid Point 1 (9th repeat):
The opposition argues that because she could plan a dungeon raid and hijack a monster, she must be sane. That is medically illiterate, just like you my good sir :>. Some of the most profound instances of 'Extreme Emotional Disturbance' involve high-functioning individuals.

Being 'insane' in a legal sense doesn't mean you lose the ability to add 2+2; it means your moral compass has been shattered by the very people she eliminated. She didn't kill for profit. She didn't kill for power. She engaged in a surgical excision of her tormentors, a phenomenon known as 'Overkill' in forensic psychology, which is a hallmark of a mind pushed beyond the breaking point.

Stupid Point 2 (not enough energy left for me to be creative in this title):
The opposition claims that because she now abides by the law and shows empathy to nara, rather than her being broken on the contrary that is the definition of a recovered state once the 'triggering stimulus' (those who made her suffer) is removed.

showing mercy to Nara proves she isn't a psychopath. A psychopath would have killed Nara for the inconvenience. The fact that she chose mercy proves her violence was specifically and exclusively a reactive trauma response to her captors.

And so, your honour, I believe my case stands on its own. Would you not feel compelled to seek vengeance against these men ? You cannot claim she should have taken them to the authorities as she was not in the right state of mind at the time—would any of us be ?

The court unanimously agreed that her actions were lawful as after putting themselves in her agonizing shoes, none of them found what he had done to her humane and were all very glad that he was slaughtered like the beast he was. (For this scenario, let’s imagine there was a camera recording the entire raid; without it, there would have been no case due to lack of evidence, and she would still be regarded as lawful because of that, but I will humour you.)

i have heard what you have said but i have seen people FAR MORE SANE than she was get off by pleading insanity so your point is null and invalid, i have said this multiple times and in multiple different ways but you just cannot read nor understand literally anything, and once again i will say that you are just needlessly drawing out a conversation with stupid points for no apparent reason at all. if you think that i am so stupid then why are you even still here ? mc is far more than just insane after the things she has gone through and the story makes that abundantly clear, you just do not like this because you sympathize for that pig of a man who was slaughtered like the beast he was. i get in the 1800s he would have gotten away with it but we are in the 21st century so your logic is older than the mush in your head is and that is pretty old!

i do not feel humiliated at all, rather i feel confused as to how any one human being can be this foolish, i said you said so yourself so READ WHAT YOU SAID, you were not talking about mc but rather about the case, and yet you have the audacity to call me the fool ? a fool is only a fool because he is blind and cannot see the world for what it is and here you fulfill this statement to totality, how many times must you call me a fool to cope with this undeniable fact ? feel free to call me so a thousand times if it makes you feel any better as your blade has long since lost it's edge and your words are vain and repetitive not to mention as predictable as a ripple in a puddle is, i am wasting my time even speaking to a man as ignorant as yourself as a fool cannot learn, intelligence can be gained at any age but at no age in a fool will it be found

you said so yourself that she was deemed temporarily insane, mc very clearly is insane after everything that she went through, i knew that and figured you would mention that aswell as that is what i would expect of a perverted man who's reasoning is darkened by his twisted mind, let's face it, you are out of reasons to fight and have been doing naught but calling me an idiot and grasping at straws, one of us clearly is an idiot and it is so clear to the point that i need not say who it is

actually in both cases the husband did not pose an immanent threat, in both cases the wife killed the husband whilst he slept and the abuse like i had said in one case took place over ten years, she could have run and escaped because he sold her body out in order to get himself money, during those times it was noted that she could have escaped but she was too scared to do so, neither was deemed as a case of self defense as the husbands could not fight back and i chose them specifically for those reasons because i knew what you would say, my response was based off of what i expected a filthy pervert to say and there was not one thing you said that was out of my expectations of a pervert such as yourself to say.

Let it be well known that i fully and completely understand your twisted sense of justice, i just refuse such fowl reasoning, justice and revenge is not murder just as the kings of old are not homicidal maniacs except for those who did truly sick deeds such as slaughtering their own men and sticking their heads on spikes, only a perverted man such as yourself would think otherwise, i dare go so far as to say that you cannot find EVEN A SINGLE FEMALE to agree with your twisted logic and thus you are still single, and if i was wrong and you do have a lover then i am sorry to say but she does not actually love you and is only there for either money or your handsome face as it certainly is not for your personality, unless everything you have been saying was not your own opinions but rather the law's then i deeply apologize for everything that i have said to you but it would be your fault i said it for not clarifying so, but even if it was from the laws perspective i showed you definite cases where the killer's actions were lawful and those people did not suffer even one tenth as much as she did and so i am left with no other reasons except to assume that it is your personality and there are a multiple cases where a person with extreme PTSD caused by some other individual is let go due to MANY YEARS OF TRAUMA impairing their reasoning, a woman was let go for killing her sleeping husband by LITERALLY SETTING HIM ON FIRE because of this AND ANOTHER ONE WAS LET GO AFTER GRUESOMLY DISMEMBERING HER HUSBAND WITH AN AXE including chopping him up whilst he was still alive because he too had done horrendous things to her over ten years, these cases were deemed LAWFUL KILLINGS and had their cases reduced to manslaughter with them being found not guilty and being released, thank you very much but i rest my case as i severely dislike talking to pervert, go listen to some nice classical music and go for long hikes in the mountains as those are very good at calming a wicked perverse mind such as yours, maybe drink lavender strawberry lemonade and take long baths, i also suggest getting a female cat as a pet (specifically something like the Ragdoll breed since those are very calm and friendly) as those are able to be your friend no matter what you are going through, do not get Guinea pigs dogs or birds unless you like screaming animals, i also found growing plants in a take or maybe growing a bamboo garden is especially relaxing and a lot of fog can leave your mind if you become vegan :D i also suggest as a final note that you look into the lives women live as they are truly rough and most importantly learn some mercy and do not be a pervert

i told you that you
1: disturb me with your lack of care for human sentience such as thinking that a person who has been tortured for seventy years has no right to seek vengeance on the ones who sent them there despite me even showing historical cases with such cases
2: have drawn this conversation on far too long with mostly nonsense only meant to drag this conversation out to the point i am rather tired of it.
3: that man was a manipulative monster who should not even be considered a man as he was closer to a beast.
4: you are quite rude and that in and of itself is enough reason to stop talking to you.
5: an eye for an eye is a rule as old as humanity and their actions took far more than simply her eyes
6: your way of thinking is basically that if the person who tortured you pays the judge enough that they should walk away free.
7: IF I WAS TO LIST LITERALLY ALL OF THE ISSUES WITH WHAT YOU HAVE SAID THEN THIS LIST WOULD GO ON FOR AGES BUT I DO NOT FEEL LIKE READING UP ON ALL OF THE SEVERAL DOZEN COMMENTS THAT YOU LEFT ME :>

and so, I bid thee adieu, this conversation was fun for a bit but please make sure that the heart in your chest is actually beating as your personality makes it seem that it has stopped a long time ago or never was in the first place :/

speak all you wish but your own words more than reveal the truth

i was originally having fun with this but the more i talk to you the more wicked of a man you feel, your opinions sadden me as they allow the wicked to flourish and harm those who are being hurt and honestly i am starting to get a tad bit sickened by this

a person with Battered Person Syndrome (BPS) killing the one responsible is often times justifiable and deemed lawful in court and the other teammates would be classified as accomplices and a captive killing the ones who captured them/sold them into slavery has been deemed lawful in time past such as the Creole Case or the case of Cyntoia Brown and those cases are far less dire than the case of our precious mc, are you even human ?? more so a monster for thinking this as your thoughts border along the lines of enslaved victims should have no rights to slay their abusive masters and regain freedom and i quite dislike people like that

Wow, your lol changed for once :O. Also, what gave you the idea that I didn’t understand what “lawful” meant? I used it correctly in every context of the word. If anything, you poking fun at it suggests that you, being so young, simply haven’t yet learned its meaning.

if you lock me to a sawblade for literally seventy years in a basement the moment i escape i am sorry but i will be killing you and anyone else who knew but did nothing whether it is considered lawful or not LOL!

murder is premeditated UNLAWFUL killing of one human being by another, i know that you are a toddler but you really should know what unlawful means at that age :>

you keep calling me names that only apply to yourself, kinda overcompensating, AND I TOLD YOU THE SAME ANSWER A MULTITUDE OF TIMES YOU SAD PIGEON absolute bird brained hairy eyed peach of a man,

the answer is so simple i have no idea how you are still confused,

1: i do not owe hitler as he still has 17 MILLION OTHER LIVES TO PAY OFF kinda like paying off a debt at the bank does not put them in debt to you,

2: those lives she took did not put her in debt BECAUSE IT WAS REVENGE AND REVENGE IS NOT AND DOES NOT COUNT AS MURDER,

her life = INNOCENT because revenge with enough weight behind it DOES NOT = MURDER

hitlers life = A LITERAL VOID OF INNOCENT LIVES AMALGAMATED INTO A DEMON WHO SHOULD BE SKINEED AND STUFFED WITH ROCKS TILL THE SEAMS IN HIS HIDE BURST

all you can do is talk about how stupid i am because you cannot even comprehend that the earth is round so you call people who think that it is stupid so that you can feel better about that little pea inside your head

as a final note, if you fail to comprehend this AGAIN, my same response to your same question for the seventh time then i will not respond, because that question will have 100% been answered by one of my seven other repeated answers so go back and ACTUALLY READ FOR ONCE.
as an ancient piece of literature two millenia of age once said:

"A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back."

or maybe

"A reproof entereth more into a wise man than an hundred stripes into a fool."

or could even be

"In the lips of him that hath understanding wisdom is found: but a rod is for the back of him that is void of understanding."

It is truly as the Bible says in Proverbs 26:3: 'A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back.' I have tried to offer you 'reproof' as one would a wise man, but since you are 'void of understanding,' I suppose even 'an hundred stripes' wouldn't make the context of this story click into that absurdly thick skull of yours. if you were my child, I am afraid that I would have to leave for the milk

It’s charming that you’ve resorted to calling me a drunken rambling baboon. I must say, your expectations of baboons are remarkably high if you think they can talk as humans do. Then again, I suppose as a human, I also had high expectations of other humans since they are my species just like you do your kin the baboons, there you are, struggling with the concept of context for the sixth time in a row. Since your brain seems to have looped yet again, let me simplify it one last time so you can finally stop squawking, if Hitler saves my life my goal would still be his death because 17 million minus one STILL EQUALS 16,999,999 so I would gladly give my one saved life in order to remove that negative value from existence no matter what it cost me! even if it took me dying one hundred thousand times to accomplish said feat it would still be worth one hundred and seventy times the pain I felt just to end his miserable existence
A debt to a protagonist who killed 4 people who tried to murder her is fine as the attempted murder cancelled out any negative value she might have been afflicted with for doing so. A debt to a dictator who killed 17 million is not even reasonable in the slightest. You keep asking 'where is the rule' about the 17 million. The 'rule' is called Basic Arithmetic and Proportionality. If you can’t tell the difference between a glass of water and the entire ocean, I cannot help you. You’re so desperate for an 'I was wrong' apology that you’ve ignored the entire point of the discussion. But please, feel free to copy-paste the same question again. It really helps prove my point about the 'toddlers level of sentience' you're working with :> Does my grammar finally meet your approval, oh high and mighty Discord mod? Or will you have trouble reading this, even though it has been mashed into something even the dullest of minds should be able to comprehend?

quite a potty mouth for a toddler to have :> i have answered this five times over so i am unsure how you are still lost, revenge does not equal murder just as hitler saving my one life does not instantly pay back those seventeen million which he took, lemme repeat that again REVENGE DOES NOT EQUAL MURDER, ONE LIFE SAVED CANNOT REPAY SEVENTEEN MILLION TAKEN, got it ? no ? wow you really are a lost cause, you think i am confused but that is because you are mistaking my footprint at the bottom of a cliff for me while i am here trying to point out the path and it is getting rather tiring because you seem unable to comprehend things, you are just repeating things over and over like a squawking parrot, yes polly i am aware she killed people, no polly hitler is not a good person, you keep saying that i am lost but that is only because you do not realize that it is you who has looped this same question on multiple occasions so let us go slowly, where are you confused exactly ? what makes your brain go ouchies ? what are you caught on that makes you keep looping ? you say i am digging my hole deeper but that is only to reach you who is doing nothing but pacing at the bottom of said hole