Point system
Daily check in (Go to your profile page): +50 points
Adding a comment: +5 points
Reply: +3 points
Delete a comment: -10 points
Get 1 upvote: +5 point
Upvoting for someone: -3 points
Get 1 downvote: -5 points
Downvoting for someone: -50 points
Min/max points: -999 to 999
You can use your points to hide ads, change your avatar,.. (These features are under development)
The Nameless OneIf you asked all the people in leadership position, they would all respond that their ideal group would be the one that follows their every order. This is true for both good and bad leaders.
That doesn't make a leader controlling.
Leading someone by definition requires a certain degree of control over the actions of it's subordinates.
Some would call this directing, leading, commanding, controlling, managing, ruling, guiding,...
But those are just words people use to describe a relationship that can only be understood if you were ever in a hierarchical group with other people, where you were led / were leading others.
If you think that the MC of this story is controlling, then you probably had an fairly easy life.
Ballsdeep69From that explanation that's fair. But usually when I hear edgy it more so applies to characters that are overly serious or severe(or violent/aggressive/grim) for their setting or in general.
Ballsdeep69You've made no attempt to understand my point, some people have goals that aren't specific but continuous- that's it. Nothing about this is particularly controversial or strange. Your opinion is that this meaning of a goal should be disregarded but you haven't adequately explained why.
SingleBiteIt's a 100% total overreaction considering that the "suspicious man wondering" is "normal man who literally just lives in the area" and the confrontation comes from bullshit rumours she just heard and believed.
Just ChillingForgave me, I have forgotten the scripture it's been 6 months. Maybe in the future when I'll remember it, I'll swiftly send a letter to you 🧐🤞
Dora Dora!!i have been bringing the trash out so i'm pretty continous as well and now i get that you don't care about the opinions of others, you just want to say yours
DedChiknRodeoI mean, I think it’s pretty much a given living things don’t go in inventories unless they want to die. The skull is undead, therefore he can go in there
User-5530665188You're the one not seeing it. First, just for the record, some lovers aren't the type to get along in a casual setting. There are people who manage to attract each other sexually or even romantically while still being like cats and dogs in a casual setting. Second, the moment you've gained a lover you've lost them as a friend. It's not just some terminology formality it's a relationship change. You won't be able to see each other the way friends do. Last, being friendzoned is a real and functional concept. It describes a situation where friendship has progressed to a point where romance is either difficult or impossible. Equating being called friend to being friendzoned is an incorrect usage (but an ok joke). Being actually freindzoned is when your crush is either too invested in the relationship to even consider risking it (and romance can tear two people apart permanently if it goes badly enough), or are so used to seeing you around them that they stop seeing you as romanceable altogether (more or less the same as how most siblings see each-other, words "she's like a sister to me" come to mind for a perfect example). Both are real situations haunting real people. So unless you just called it stupid out of spite, and you really don't understand the above then, sorry but you're the stupid one.
- If images not showing, please try reloading (F5) the page, or switch to image server 2 or server 3. If you are using UC Browser, please disable AD Blocker in browser settings.