What the quest girl is just in the lobby now? Or did they teleport and she like flops back into the water and becoming dragon food

Its so over for our favorite neighborhood baldy

Marry the mother, fulfil the prophecy. The daughter is no good, only MILF.
MILF for life, MILF til death
This is the only way

Damn

What a joker

Ntr does not fit in this series

Smart bean sprout, very smart

Prez is such a lad. Me like

Brooo, fried bean sprout got me fucked up emotionally. My life is cooked

Fuck i want myself some fried bean sprouts

The nerfs are crazy this patch

I’m investing

Brooo… freaky ah love interests

It’s over for my boy 😭😭😭

My bad man I just graduated high school and am trying to pick a major so I’m kinda just stuck with a ton of time and a brain that’s hella locked in.

I wonder if you can cook those dragon legs, I mean they gotta taste good right

unrequited love is the only love i accept
https://i.postimg.cc/FsHySFJB/i.png

Ok now after reading through like three articles, there are both scientists which do use "truly incompressible" models of liquid in their research, while other use "weakly compressible" and additionally there are comparisons, an example being in the Journal of Hydraulic Research 2010 (found on google scholar). However, even this has to make the assumption that fluids can be "incompressible" to make the comparison.

When regarding "incompressibility" within "fluid" (which is not necessarily a liquid) the discussion moves to models of "flows" and "equations" which I have yet to understand (will be doing more research). One book (which I found on google scholar), "Perfect Incompressible Fluids" published by Oxford Science Publications, had to list the achieving of a truly "incompressible liquid" within a list of assumptions which lead to theoretical equations of an incompressible which apparently exists in the second dimension. Though this book quite dated being published in 1996.

So tried a more modern approach (also within google scholar): A book, "Incompressible Flow" published in 2024 and written by Ronold L. Panton a Professor at the University of Austin (Walker Department of Engineering), separated the understanding of compressible and incompressible flows into two subcategories. One which, the "density changes within the fluid are not an important part of the physics" and another where "fluid density is important". Subjects which incorporate the notion of incompressible flow include the fields of "hydraulics, hydrodynamics, lubrication theory, aerodynamics and boundary layer theory". Panton also stated that water was a "nearly incompressible liquid" within writing. I have not quite finished reading this so I would like time to gather a bit more from this one.

Regarding the creation 4th state of matter which mentioned upon the compression of liquid, the closest thing I could find was general descriptions of matter, however I did manage to find an article by IOPscience labeled "Compressibility of liquids and hydrostatic pressure" (2024). This particular article aimed at disproving the "assumption that liquids are incompressible", a "simplification" derived for "college-level textbooks", with it's objective being to "illustrate the limitations of the incompressible liquid model". This too is one article that I have not finished reading as I just stumbled across it while rereading your comment, sorry.https://i.postimg.cc/13t0h73Y/i.png
Overall there seems to be much I personally don't understand, as practically speaking I still do not know of the mechanism that make liquids, fluids or flows "incompressible" or "near incompressible" in the first place. This is where I will research next, and if you have any quires I will attend to them, as I am now genuinely curious about the nature of liquids.

they're so adorable, I want a college arc, workspace arc, elderly arc, confession arc then marriage arc in that order

I needa stop thinking about this man...